Dynamics of the aortic annulus in 4D CT angiography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients

被引:13
|
作者
Elattar, Mustafa A. [1 ]
Vink, Leon W. [1 ]
van Mourik, Martijn S. [2 ]
Baan, Jan, Jr. [2 ]
van Bavel, Ed T. [1 ]
Planken, R. Nils [3 ]
Marquering, Henk A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn & Phys, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Heart Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 09期
关键词
MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ROOT; CALCIFICATION; DIAMETER; SYSTOLE; REGURGITATION; SEGMENTATION; DIMENSIONS; STIFFNESS; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0184133
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. This procedure requires pre-operative planning by assessment of aortic dimensions on CT Angiography (CTA). It is well-known that the aortic root dimensions vary over the heart cycle. However, sizing is commonly performed at either mid-systole or end-diastole only, which has resulted in an inadequate understanding of its full dynamic behavior. Study goal We studied the variation in annulus measurements during the cardiac cycle and determined if this variation is dependent on the amount of calcification at the annulus. Methods We measured and compared aortic root annular dimensions and calcium volume in CTA acquisitions at 10 cardiac cycle phases in 51 aortic stenosis patients. Sub-group analysis was performed based on the volume of calcium by splitting the population into mildly and severely calcified valves subgroups. Results For most annulus measurements, the largest differences were found between 10% and 70 to 80% cardiac cycle phases. Mean difference (+/- standard deviation) in annular minimum diameter, maximum diameter, area, and aspect ratio between mid-systole and end-diastole phases were 1.0 +/- 0.29 mm (p = 0.065), 0.30 +/- 0.24 mm (p = 0.7), 24.1 +/- 7.6 mm(2) (p < 0.001), and 0.041 +/- 0.012 (p = 0.039) respectively. Calcium volume measurements varied strongly during the cardiac cycle. The dynamic annulus area was behaving differently between mildly and severely calcified subgroups (p = 0.02). Furthermore, patients with severe aortic calcification were associated with larger annulus diameters. Conclusion There is a significant variation of annulus area and calcium volume measurement during the cardiac cycle. In our measurements, only the dynamic variation of the annulus area is dependent on the severity of the aortic calcification. For TAVI candidates, the annulus area is significantly larger in mid-systole compared to end-diastole.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR PATIENTS WITH ELLIPTICAL AORTIC ANNULUS
    Hayashida, Kentaro
    Bouvier, Erik
    Lefevre, Thierry
    Chevalier, Bernard
    Hovasse, Thomas
    Romano, Mauro
    Garot, Philippe
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Farge, Arnaud
    Donzeau-Gouge, Patrick
    Cormier, Bertrand
    Morice, Marie-Claude
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E1994 - E1994
  • [2] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation In Patients With a Large Aortic Annulus
    Barr, Peter
    Ormiston, John
    Stewart, Jim
    Nand, Parma
    Ramanathan, Tharumenthiran
    Webster, Mark
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2018, 27 (03): : E11 - E14
  • [3] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with elliptical aortic annulus
    Hayashida, K.
    Bouvier, E.
    Lefevre, T.
    Chevalier, B.
    Hovasse, T.
    Garot, P.
    Watanabe, Y.
    Romano, M.
    Cormier, B.
    Morice, M. C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 482 - 482
  • [4] Aortic Annulus Evaluation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Hutter, Andrea
    Opitz, Anke
    Bleiziffer, Sabine
    Ruge, Hendrik
    Hettich, Ina
    Mazzitelli, Domenico
    Will, Albrecht
    Tassani, Peter
    Bauernschmitt, Robert
    Lange, Ruediger
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 76 (07) : 1009 - 1019
  • [5] Aortic annulus rupture and transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Vanhuyse, Fabrice
    Folliguet, Thierry
    Grandmougin, Daniel
    Elfarra, Mazen
    Moulin, Frederic
    Villemot, Jean-Pierre
    Maureira, Pablo
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2015, 70 (03) : 371 - 372
  • [6] Interobserver variability of CT angiography for evaluation of aortic annulus dimensions prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
    Schmidkonz, C.
    Marwan, M.
    Klinghammer, L.
    Mitschke, M.
    Schuhbaeck, A.
    Arnold, M.
    Lell, M.
    Achenbach, S.
    Pflederer, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (09) : 1672 - 1678
  • [7] The role of echocardiography and CT angiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients
    Chourdakis, Emmanouil
    Koniari, Ioanna
    Kounis, Nicholas G.
    Velissaris, Dimitrios
    Koutsogiannis, Nikolaos
    Tsigkas, Grigorios
    Hauptmann, Karl Eugen
    Sontag, Bruno
    Hahalis, George
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (01) : 86 - 94
  • [8] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus
    Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    Doyle, Daniel
    De Larochelliere, Robert
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Dumont, Eric
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (10) : 1016 - 1024
  • [9] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus
    Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri
    Doyle, Daniel
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    DeLarochelliere, Robert
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Dumont, Eric
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [10] Automatic segmentation of the aortic root in CT angiography of candidate patients for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    M. A. Elattar
    E. M. Wiegerinck
    R. N. Planken
    E. vanbavel
    H. C. van Assen
    J. Baan
    H. A. Marquering
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2014, 52 : 611 - 618