Shaft and Base Capacity of Snakeskin-Inspired Piles from Centrifuge Pile Tests

被引:0
|
作者
O'Hara, Kyle B. [1 ]
Martinez, Alejandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FRICTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Many deep foundation applications require large shaft resistances for tensile loading, such as reaction piles and caissons. A suitable analog for designing surfaces whose load transfer response depends on the direction of loading is the skin along the underbody of snakes. Snakes have developed scales that minimize frictional resistances when they move forward (caudal direction, along the scales) and maximize frictional resistances when they move backward (cranial direction, against the scales). Previous studies show that surfaces designed based on such analogues exhibit directional dependence in terms of both interface friction angle and dilation. In order to assess the shaft and base capacity generated by piles with such surfaces, a series of centrifuge load tests were conducted on model piles with internal strain gages to evaluate the mobilization of shaft and base resistances. It was found that piles installed in the caudal direction mobilized smaller installation forces and similar pullout capacities compared to the rough pile, whereas piles installed in the cranial direction generated greater installation forces and a similar pullout capacity compared to the smooth pile. In addition, spatial variability in the model was assessed using CPT soundings and it was found that the shaft texturing had a negligible effect on the unit base resistance during installation. The results presented highlight that the surface of piles can be designed to reduce skin friction mobilized during installation relative to the skin friction generated during tensile loading resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 180
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results
    Madhira, Madhav
    Kota, Vijay Kiran
    INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 53 (06) : 1505 - 1516
  • [42] Axial capacity of tapered piles established from model tests
    El Naggar, M
    Wei, JQ
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 36 (06) : 1185 - 1194
  • [43] Comparative tests on bearing capacity of cast-in-situ X-shaped concrete piles and circular pile
    Zhang, Min-Xia
    Liu, Han-Long
    Ding, Xuan-Ming
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33 (09): : 1469 - 1476
  • [44] Large-scale tests on driven piles for the investigation of pile capacity under cyclic loading and ageing effects
    Ruecker, Werner
    Karabeliov, Krassimire
    Cuellar, Pablo
    Baessler, Matthias
    Georgi, Steven
    GEOTECHNIK, 2013, 36 (02) : 77 - 89
  • [45] Bearing capacity of piles in clayey soils from calculations and field tests
    Dimov L.A.
    Dimov I.L.
    Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2006, 43 (3) : 109 - 113
  • [46] Prediction of lateral capacity of piles in clays from standard penetration tests
    Prasad, YVSN
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH (1997) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL I, 1997, 1997, : 767 - 771
  • [47] Seismic Response from Centrifuge Model Tests of a Scoured Bridge with a Pile-Group Foundation
    Liang, Fayun
    Liang, Xuan
    Zhang, Hao
    Wang, Chen
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2020, 25 (08)
  • [48] End bearing capacity of embedded pile with inclined base plate: Field dynamic and static tests
    Seo, Mi Jeong
    Han, Kyungsoo
    Park, Jong-Bae
    Jeong, Kyeong-Han
    Lee, Jong-Sub
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 26 (03) : 261 - 274
  • [49] Pile Shaft Capacity from Cone Penetration Test Records Considering Scale Effects
    Eslami, Abolfazl
    Lotfi, Sepide
    Infante, Julio Angel
    Moshfeghi, Sara
    Eslami, Mohammad M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2020, 20 (07)
  • [50] A Method for Predicting Pile Bearing Capacity From Dynamic Penetration Tests
    Schnaid, F.
    Langone, M. J.
    SOILS AND ROCKS, 2013, 36 (01): : 55 - 65