Ownership Structure and Risk-taking Behavior: Evidence from Banks in Korea and Japan

被引:4
|
作者
Chun, Sun Eae [2 ]
Nagano, Mamoru [1 ]
Lee, Min Hwan [3 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Mizuho Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4678501, Japan
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Grad Sch Int Studies, Seoul 156756, South Korea
[3] Inha Univ, Coll Business Adm, Div Global Finance & Banking, Inchon 402751, South Korea
关键词
bank ownership structure; managerial ownership; moral hazard; franchise value; risk-taking behavior; CORPORATE-CONTROL; EQUITY OWNERSHIP; CAPITAL DECISION; DEREGULATION; COSTS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8381.2011.02056.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the effects of managerial ownership on the risk-taking behavior of Korean and Japanese banks during the relatively regulated period of the late 1990s to the early 2000s. It finds that managerial ownership alone does not affect either the risk or the profit levels of Korean banks. In contrast, an increase in managerial ownership adds to the total risk of Japanese banks. However, increased risk-taking behavior does not produce higher levels of profit for Japanese banks. The coefficients of the interaction term between franchise value and managerial ownership are negative and statistically significant for both the Korean and the Japanese banking industries. This means that an increase in managerial ownership in banks with high franchise values discourages risk-taking behavior. The results confirm the disciplinary role of franchise value on the risk-taking behavior of banks. These results also fall in line with previous literature supporting the moral hazard hypothesis based on research into the economies of the USA and other countries.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 175
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Ownership Structure on Bank Diversification and Risk-Taking Behavior in Bangladesh
    Moudud-Ul-Huq, Syed
    Biswas, Tanmay
    Chakraborty, Brishti
    Al Amin, Md
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 7 (11): : 647 - 656
  • [22] Risk-taking behavior of banks under regulation
    Park, SK
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1997, 21 (04) : 491 - 507
  • [23] OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, DEREGULATION, AND BANK RISK-TAKING
    SAUNDERS, A
    STROCK, E
    TRAVLOS, NG
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1990, 45 (02): : 643 - 654
  • [24] Are private banks the better banks? An insight into the principal–agent structure and risk-taking behavior of German banks
    Schmielewski F.
    Wein T.
    Journal of Economics and Finance, 2015, 39 (3) : 518 - 540
  • [25] Financial Repression and Bank Risk-taking Behavior: Evidence from Listed Commercial Banks in China
    Chu, Shun-Ho
    Shao, Yunyun
    Lin, Wenchien
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS SYSTEM AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY ENGINEERING (IEIS), 2016,
  • [26] Ultimate ownership, risk-taking and firm value: evidence from China
    Su, Kun
    Li, Liuchuang
    Wan, Rui
    ASIA PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 23 (01) : 10 - 26
  • [27] Ownership structure, risk taking, and financial stability of conventional rural banks: evidence from Indonesia
    Mai, Muhamad Umar
    Sudradjat, Etti Ernita
    Sembiring, Etti Ernita
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [28] Liberalization and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Government-Controlled Banks
    Illueca, Manuel
    Norden, Lars
    Udell, Gregory F.
    REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2014, 18 (04) : 1217 - 1257
  • [29] Institutional Ownership and Corporate Risk-taking: Indian Evidence
    Jha, Ratish Kumar
    Tiwari, Reshma Kumari
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2025,
  • [30] Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
    Abbas, Faisal
    Ali, Shoaib
    Yousaf, Imran
    Wong, Wing-Keung
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (06)