The US Food and Drug Administration's Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Meeting Program: Progress to date

被引:12
|
作者
Price, Dionne [1 ]
Scott, John [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
Food and Drug Administration; complex innovative trial designs; pilot program;
D O I
10.1177/17407745211050580
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have been leaders in advancing science to protect and promote public health by ensuring that safe and effective drugs and biological products are available to those who need them. Recently, new therapeutic discoveries, increased understanding of disease mechanisms, the need for innovation to optimally use resources, and global public health crises have led to an evolving drug development landscape. As a result, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and medical product developers are faced with unique challenges and opportunities. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is proactively meeting the challenges of this evolving landscape through various efforts, including the Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Meeting Program. Our focus, here, will be on the pilot meeting program. Methods The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has defined a process to facilitate the implementation of the Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Meeting Program. The process is transparent and outlines the steps and timeline for submission, review, and meetings. Results Five submitted meeting requests have been selected for participation in the Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Meeting Program. Conclusion The pilot meeting program has been successful in further educating stakeholders on the potential uses of complex innovative designs in trials intended to provide substantial evidence of effectiveness. The selected submissions, thus far, have all utilized a Bayesian framework. The reasons for the use of Bayesian approaches may be due to the flexibility provided, the ability to incorporate multiple sources of evidence, and a desire to better understand the U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective on such approaches. We are confident the pilot meeting program will have continued success and impact the collective goal of bringing safe and effective medical products to patients.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 710
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monitoring of domestic and imported apples and rice by the US Food and Drug Administration pesticide program
    Roy, RR
    Wilson, P
    Laski, RR
    Roberts, JI
    Weishaar, JA
    Bong, RL
    Yess, NJ
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 80 (04) : 883 - 894
  • [32] US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval Program for Nononcology Drug Indications Between 1992 and 2018
    Omae, Kenji
    Onishi, Akira
    Sahker, Ethan
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (09)
  • [33] Oncology Drug Advisory Committee Recommendations and the US Food and Drug Administration's Actions
    Haslam, Alyson
    Gill, Jennifer
    Prasad, Vinay
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 95 (02) : 424 - 426
  • [34] Working with the US Food and Drug Administration: Progress and timelines in understanding and treating patients with eosinophilic esophagitis
    Rothenberg, Marc E.
    Aceves, Seema
    Bonis, Peter A.
    Collins, Margaret H.
    Gonsalves, Nirmala
    Gupta, Sandeep K.
    Hirano, Ikuo
    Liacouras, Chris A.
    Putnam, Phil E.
    Spergel, Jonathan M.
    Straumann, Alex
    Wershil, Barry K.
    Furuta, Glenn T.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 130 (03) : 617 - 619
  • [35] The Role of the US Food and Drug Administration Review Process: Clinical Trial Endpoints in Oncology
    McKee, Amy E.
    Farrell, Ann T.
    Pazdur, Richard
    Woodcock, Janet
    ONCOLOGIST, 2010, 15 : 13 - 18
  • [36] An Evaluation of US Food and Drug Administration's Program to Register HIV Drugs for Use in Resource-Constrained Settings
    Chahal, Harinder Singh
    Koukounas, Kalli
    Capella, Peter
    Presto, Ryan
    Murray, Jeffrey S.
    Shimer, Martin
    Riley, Karen
    Valdez, Mary Lou
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (11)
  • [37] The US Food and Drug Administration's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program - Current Status and Future Direction
    Wu, Jasmanda
    Juhaeri, Juhaeri
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 38 (12) : 2526 - 2532
  • [38] Summary of the 2008 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-US Food and Drug Administration Workshop on Food Allergy Clinical Trial Design
    Plaut, Marshall
    Sawyer, Richard T.
    Fenton, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 124 (04) : 671 - 678
  • [39] Prospective surveillance pilot of rivaroxaban safety within the US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel System
    Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
    Gagne, Joshua J.
    Fireman, Bruce
    Nelson, Jennifer
    Toh, Sengwee
    Shoaibi, Azadeh
    Reichman, Marsha E.
    Wang, Shirley
    Nguyen, Michael
    Zhang, Rongmei
    Izem, Rima
    Goulding, Margie R.
    Southworth, Mary Ross
    Graham, David J.
    Fuller, Candace
    Katcoff, Hannah
    Woodworth, Tiffany
    Rogers, Catherine
    Saliga, Ryan
    Lin, Nancy D.
    McMahill-Walraven, Cheryl N.
    Nair, Vinit P.
    Haynes, Kevin
    Carnahan, Ryan M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 (03) : 263 - 271
  • [40] Prospective Surveillance Pilot of Rivaroxaban Safety Within the US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel System
    Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
    Gagne, Joshua
    Fireman, Bruce
    Nelson, Jennifer C.
    Toh, Sengwee
    Shoaibi, Azadeh
    Reichman, Marsha E.
    Wang, Shirley V.
    Nguyen, Michael D.
    Zhang, Rongmei
    Izem, Rima
    Goulding, Margie R.
    Southworth, Mary Ross
    Graham, David J.
    Fuller, Candace C.
    Katcoff, Hannah
    Woodworth, Tiffany S.
    Rogers, Catherine
    Saliga, Ryan M.
    Lin, Nancy D.
    McMahill-Walraven, Cheryl N.
    Nair, Vinit P.
    Haynes, Kevin
    Carnahan, Ryan M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 450 - 450