Low-energy parameters and spin gap of a frustrated spin-s Heisenberg antiferromagnet with s ≤ 3/2 on the honeycomb lattice

被引:2
|
作者
Bishop, R. F. [1 ]
Li, P. H. Y.
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Phys & Astron, Schuster Bldg, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
COUPLED-CLUSTER METHOD; MODEL FIELD-THEORIES; WAVE-FUNCTIONS; GROUND-STATE; ELECTRON CORRELATIONS; PARAMETRIZATIONS; PHASE; ORDER; EXPANSIONS;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/1041/1/012001
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
coupled cluster method is implemented at high orders of approximation to investigate the zero-temperature (T = 0) phase diagram of the frustrated spin-s J(1)-J(2)-J(3) antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice. The system has isotropic Heisenberg interactions of strength J(1) > 0, J(2) > 0 and J(3) > 0 between nearest-neighbour, next-nearest-neighbour and next-next-nearest-neighbour pairs of spins, respectively. We study it in the case J(3) = J(2) = kJ(1) in the window 0 <= k <= 1 that contains the classical tricritical point (at k(cl) = 1/2) of maximal frustration, appropriate to the limiting value .s -> infinity of the spin quantum number. We present results for the magnetic order parameter M, the triplet spin gap Delta, the spin stiffness P-s and the zero-field transverse magnetic susceptibility chi for the two collinear quasiclassical antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases with Neel and striped order, respectively. Results for M and Delta are given for the three cases s = 1/2.s = 1 and s = 3/2, while those for P-s, and chi are given for the two cases s = 1/2 and s = 1. On the basis of all these results we find that the spin-1 and spin-1 models both have an intermediate paramagnetic phase, with no discernible magnetic long-range order, between the two AFM phases in their T = 0 phase diagrams, while for s > 1 there is a direct transition between them. Accurate values are found for all of the associated quantum critical points. While the results also provide strong evidence for the intermediate phase being gapped for the case s = they are less conclusive for the cases s= 1. On balance however, at least the transition in the latter case at the striped phase boundary seems to be to a gapped intermediate state.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thermodynamics of the kagome-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet with arbitrary spin S
    Mueller, P.
    Zander, A.
    Richter, J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2018, 98 (02)
  • [22] MODIFIED SPIN-WAVE THEORY FOR THE FRUSTRATED HEISENBERG ANTIFERROMAGNET ON A SQUARE LATTICE
    Wu, You
    Chen, Yuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 2013, 27 (11):
  • [23] S=3/2 spin systems on frustrated pyrochlore lattice
    Ueda, Hiroaki
    Yamaura, Jun-ichi
    Mitamuraa, Hiroyuki
    Goto, Tsuneaki
    Katori, Hiroko Aruga
    Takagi, Hidenori
    Ueda, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2007, 310 (02) : 1275 - 1279
  • [24] A SPIN-S MODEL ON A BETHE LATTICE
    TAMASHIRO, MN
    SALINAS, SRA
    PHYSICA A, 1994, 211 (01): : 124 - 146
  • [25] THERMODYNAMICS OF THE SPIN-S ANTIFERROMAGNETIC HEISENBERG CHAIN
    SACRAMENTO, PD
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIK B-CONDENSED MATTER, 1994, 94 (03): : 347 - 352
  • [26] Spin-Peierls dimerization of a s=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice
    Al-Omari, A
    JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2000, 69 (10) : 3387 - 3396
  • [27] Thermodynamic properties of frustrated arbitrary spin-S J1-J2 quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the body-centered-cubic lattice in random phase approximation
    Mi, Bin-Zhou
    SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 239 : 20 - 26
  • [28] Low-energy excitations of the kagome antiferromagnet and the spin-gap issue
    Sindzingre, P.
    Lhuillier, C.
    EPL, 2009, 88 (02)
  • [29] Magnetic order on a frustrated spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the Union Jack lattice
    Bishop, R. F.
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Farnell, D. J. J.
    Campbell, C. E.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2010, 82 (02):
  • [30] On the non-Heisenberg contribution to the spin-spin interaction of an antiferromagnet with S=3/2
    Kalita, VM
    Lozenko, AF
    LOW TEMPERATURE PHYSICS, 2002, 28 (01) : 66 - 68