Carbon dioxide and water fluxes from switchgrass managed for bioenergy production

被引:56
|
作者
Skinner, R. Howard [1 ]
Adler, Paul R. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Switchgrass; Gross primary productivity; Ecosystem respiration; Carbon sequestration; Evapotranspiration; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; EDDY-CORRELATION; USE EFFICIENCY; NITROGEN; EXCHANGE; BIOMASS; SEQUESTRATION; RESPIRATION; GRASSES; PRAIRIE;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.008
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L) is an important bioenergy crop with the potential to provide a reliable supply of renewable energy while also sequestering C in the soil. The purpose of this study was to quantify CO2 fluxes during the establishment and early production years of a young switchgrass stand in the northeastern USA. Switchgrass was sown in June 2004 and daily CO2 fluxes were measured for four years. Gross primary productivity (GPP) varied little among years, but ecosystem respiration (Re) decreased over time. The switchgrass generally began to take up CO2 in mid-May and continued until early-October, and was a net sink during a 98-day period from late-May through early-September. The rest of the year experienced a net loss of CO2 to the atmosphere. Harvested biomass increased each year and was not related to GPP. The switchgrass field was a net CO2 sink for the first three years, but became a source the final year due to increased removal of C as harvested biomass. This study suggests that in addition to their primary function as a source of renewable energy, switchgrass bioenergy crops in the northeastern USA can sequester CO2 for at least the first few years following establishment. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Partitioning carbon dioxide and water vapor fluxes using correlation analysis
    Scanlon, Todd M.
    Kustas, William P.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2010, 150 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [42] Methane and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes at the Sediment-Water Interface in Reservoirs
    Gruca-Rokosz, Renata
    Tomaszek, Janusz Andrzej
    Koszelnik, Piotr
    Czerwieniec, Ewa
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2011, 20 (01): : 81 - 86
  • [43] Soil pore characteristics and the fate of new switchgrass-derived carbon in switchgrass and prairie bioenergy cropping systems
    Kim, Kyungmin
    Juyal, Archana
    Kravchenko, Alexandra
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [44] Comparative studies on indoor and outdoor microalgal cultivations for carbon dioxide fixation and bioenergy production
    Kim, Z-Hun
    Kim, Eung-Sic
    Kang, Sin Ae
    Kim, Dong-Keon
    Lee, Choul-Gyun
    JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, 2009, 108 : S90 - S91
  • [45] Water demands for bioenergy production
    Varis, Olli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 23 (03) : 519 - 535
  • [46] Carbon dioxide fluxes from cyanobacteria crusted soils in the Kalahari
    Thomas, A. D.
    Hoon, S. R.
    Linton, P. E.
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2008, 39 (03) : 254 - 263
  • [47] Hourly methane and carbon dioxide fluxes from temperate ponds
    Jonas Stage Sø
    Kenneth Thorø Martinsen
    Theis Kragh
    Kaj Sand-Jensen
    Biogeochemistry, 2024, 167 : 177 - 195
  • [48] Regional carbon dioxide fluxes from mixing ratio data
    Bakwin, PS
    Davis, KJ
    Yi, C
    Wofsy, SC
    Munger, JW
    Haszpra, L
    Barcza, Z
    TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2004, 56 (04): : 301 - 311
  • [49] Native shrubland and managed buffelgrass savanna in drylands: Implications for ecosystem carbon and water fluxes
    Hinojo-Hinojo, Cesar
    Castellanos, Alejandro E.
    Huxman, Travis
    Rodriguez, Julio C.
    Vargas, Rodrigo
    Romo-Leon, Jose R.
    Biederman, Joel A.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 268 : 269 - 278
  • [50] Carbon dioxide fluxes from Tifway bermudagrass: early results
    Cotten, David L.
    Zhang, G.
    Leclerc, M. Y.
    Raymer, P.
    Steketee, C. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2017, 61 (01) : 103 - 113