Applications of machine learning methods in traffic crash severity modelling: current status and future directions

被引:51
|
作者
Wen, Xiao [1 ]
Xie, Yuanchang [1 ]
Jiang, Liming [1 ]
Pu, Ziyuan [2 ]
Ge, Tingjian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1 Univ Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Engn, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Comp Sci, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
关键词
Crash severity; machine learning; decision tree; artificial neural networks; random forests; support vector machines; DRIVER INJURY SEVERITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; DATA MINING APPROACH; ACCIDENT SEVERITY; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT; HYBRID APPROACH; SINGLE-VEHICLE; DECISION RULES; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2021.1954108
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
As a key area of traffic safety research, crash severity modelling has attracted tremendous attention. Recently, there has been growing interest in applying machine learning (ML) methods in this area. However, the lessons and experience learned so far have not been systematically documented and summarised. This is the first article that surveys studies on ML applications in crash severity modelling and has the following major contributions: (1) it provides a comprehensive and critical review of current research efforts; (2) it summarises the successful experience and main challenges (e.g. data and methodology); and (3) it identifies promising research opportunities towards accurate and reliable crash severity modelling and results interpretation. The review results suggest that imbalanced data remains a major issue. Under- and over-samplings are often used to balance crash severity data despite their limitations. Some studies use local sensitivity analysis (LSA) to interpret ML modelling results but ignore the strict assumptions of LSA and omit the joint effects of risk factors. Moreover, very few studies consider the accuracy and reliability of ML model evaluation metrics. Other issues include spatiotemporal correlations, causality, model transferability and heterogeneity. This paper concludes by providing suggestions on model selection and modification to address the identified issues and recommendations for future research. For example, employing advanced ML methods such as graph convolutional networks (GCN) to model spatiotemporal correlations; exploring innovative ways of applying ML methods; and leveraging new developments in ML (e.g. interpretable ML) to derive causal relationships and interpret modelling results.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 879
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current status and future directions of wind energy applications in Turkey
    Ozgener, O
    Hepbasli, A
    ENERGY SOURCES, 2002, 24 (12): : 1117 - 1129
  • [22] Causal Analysis and Classification of Traffic Crash Injury Severity Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Meghna Chakraborty
    Timothy J. Gates
    Subhrajit Sinha
    Data Science for Transportation, 2023, 5 (2):
  • [23] A review on the applications of machine learning and deep learning to groundwater salinity modeling: present status, challenges, and future directions
    Dilip Kumar Roy
    Tapash Kumar Sarkar
    Tasnia Hossain Munmun
    Chitra Rani Paul
    Bithin Datta
    Discover Water, 5 (1):
  • [24] Machine Learning in Malware Analysis: Current Trends and Future Directions
    Altaha, Safa
    Riad, Khaled
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01) : 1267 - 1279
  • [25] CURRENT STATUS - FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    MATTHEWS, JL
    CALCIFIED TISSUE RESEARCH, 1978, : 425 - 429
  • [26] Applications of AI and machine learning in mining: digitization and future directions
    Arun Kumar Sahoo
    Debi Prasad Tripathy
    Safety in Extreme Environments, 2025, 7 (1):
  • [27] Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Definitions, Applications, and Future Directions
    Helm, J. Matthew
    Swiergosz, Andrew M.
    Haeberle, Heather S.
    Karnuta, Jaret M.
    Schaffer, Jonathan L.
    Krebs, Viktor E.
    Spitzer, Andrew, I
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [28] Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Definitions, Applications, and Future Directions
    J. Matthew Helm
    Andrew M. Swiergosz
    Heather S. Haeberle
    Jaret M. Karnuta
    Jonathan L. Schaffer
    Viktor E. Krebs
    Andrew I. Spitzer
    Prem N. Ramkumar
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2020, 13 : 69 - 76
  • [29] Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities
    Xu, Zhaoyi
    Saleh, Joseph Homer
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 211
  • [30] Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities
    Xu, Zhaoyi
    Saleh, Joseph Homer
    Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2021, 211