Life Cycle Inventory and Assessment of different Solar Photovoltaic Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Baharwani, Vishakha [1 ]
Meena, Neetu [1 ]
Dubey, Alka [1 ]
Sharma, Deepak [2 ]
Brighu, Urmila [1 ]
Mathur, Jyotirmay [1 ]
机构
[1] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[2] Inst Technol & Management, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Life Cycle Analysis; Solar PV System; GHG emission; EPBT; PAY-BACK TIME; PV SYSTEMS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGY PAYBACK; CO2; EMISSIONS; MODULES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Electricity generation is a key source to global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and their related environmental impact. Sustainable development requires methods and tools to measure the environmental impacts of human activities for various products viz. goods, services, etc. Life-cycle analysis is an invaluable tool for evaluating the environmental profile of a product or technology from cradle to grave. Such life-cycle analysis of energy technologies are essential, especially as material and energy flows are often interwoven, and divergent emissions into the environment may occur at different life-cycle-stages. Photovoltaic system is a technology for the production of electricity from renewable sources that is rapidly growing thanks to its potential to reduce the energy consumption from traditional sources and to decrease the air pollution. During the operational phase, there are no emissions and the only input is solar power. However, it should be noted that, considering the entire life cycle of a plant, photovoltaic systems, like any other means of electricity production, give rise to emissions that focus especially in the manufacturing stage and installation of components. In this study, the environmental load of photovoltaic power generation system (PV) during its life cycle by energy payback time (EPT) and Greenhouse Gas emissions are reviewed through LCA study to the state of art of the photovoltaic technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic module backsheets
    de Wild, Paul
    de Wild-Scholten, Mariska
    Goudswaard, Imco
    PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2025, 33 (01): : 27 - 39
  • [42] Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation
    Stoppato, A.
    ENERGY, 2008, 33 (02) : 224 - 232
  • [43] Life cycle assessment of a micromorph photovoltaic system
    Bravi, Mirko
    Parisi, Maria Laura
    Tiezzi, Enzo
    Basosi, Riccardo
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (07) : 4297 - 4306
  • [44] Environmental assessment of Brownfield rehabilitation using two different life cycle inventory models
    Lesage, Pascal
    Ekvall, Tomas
    Deschenes, Louise
    Samson, Rejean
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (06): : 391 - 398
  • [45] Concentrating solar systems: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and environmental issues
    Lamnatou, Chr
    Chemisana, D.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 916 - 932
  • [46] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ACCURACY IN A BUILDING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT: A CASE STUDY ON THE THREE DIFFERENT ACCURACY OF INVENTORY
    Takano, Atsushi
    Kuittinen, Matti
    SUSTAINABLE BUILDING AND REFURBISHMENT FOR NEXT GENERATIONS, 2013, : 801 - 804
  • [47] Challenges and Solutions in Solar Photovoltaic Technology Life Cycle
    Ullah, Nehar
    Ahmad, Altaf
    Sarfaraz, Rafia
    Khalid, Saifullah
    Ali, Irshad
    Younas, Mohammad
    Rezakazemi, Mashallah
    CHEMBIOENG REVIEWS, 2023, 10 (04) : 541 - 584
  • [48] The Indian solar photovoltaic industry: a life cycle analysis
    Srinivasan, Sunderasan
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (01): : 133 - 147
  • [49] Life cycle assessment of solar communities
    Guarino, Francesco
    Longo, Sonia
    Vermette, Caroline Hachem
    Cellura, Maurizio
    La Rocca, Vincenzo
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 207 : 209 - 217
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of construction and renovation of sewer systems using a detailed inventory tool
    Serni Morera
    Christian Remy
    Joaquim Comas
    Lluís Corominas
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 1121 - 1133