Occupational exposure to cisplatin/oxaliplatin during Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)?

被引:30
|
作者
Ametsbichler, Paul [1 ]
Boehlandt, Antje [1 ]
Nowak, Dennis [1 ]
Schierl, Rudolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst & Clin Occupat Social & Environm Med, Univ Hosp, Ziemssenstr 1, D-80336 Munich, Germany
来源
EJSO | 2018年 / 44卷 / 11期
关键词
PIPAC; Occupational exposure; Environmental monitoring; Platinum; Contamination; Peritoneal carcinomatosis; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; BODY-SURFACE-AREA; PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS; ANTINEOPLASTIC DRUGS; CONTAMINATION; SAFETY; PROGNOSIS; PLATINUM; CANCER; RISKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new promising treatment for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. It is supposed to provide a higher local drug concentration and deeper penetrate into the tumor tissue compared to systemic chemotherapy or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion (HIPEC). Due to the application of cytotoxic drug aerosols within the operating room (OR), concern has been raised regarding the occupational exposure risk of the involved OR staff. Materials and Methods: In this study, an OR workplace monitoring was performed during 14 PIPAC procedures in two hospitals by collecting air samples (n = 14) during PIPAC and wipe samples (n = 223) before and after PIPAC: 56 samples from the OR floor, 84 from the injector, 28 from trocars and 55 from gloves. All samples were analyzed for platinum (Pt). Results: While air Pt concentrations were below 3.1 pg/m(3), surface contaminations widely varied between 0.01 pg/cm(2) and 1733 pg/cm(2) (median 1.04 pg/cm(2)), with substantial Pt concentrations on injector parts (i.e. syringe holder) and trocars. Floors and particularly injectors were often higher contaminated before compared to after PIPAC, probably due to inefficient cleaning or cross-contamination. Glove samples taken after different tasks ranged between 0,04 and 423 pg/cm(2) (median 0.58 pg/cm(2)). Conclusion: Contamination on various OR surfaces widely ranged and can lead to a distribution of cytotoxic drug residues. However, the air contamination was very low. The results indicate that PIPAC performance seems to be possible with low occupational exposure risk, but adequate safety and cleaning standards for PIPAC must be developed and monitored. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1793 / 1799
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immediate allergy to platinum based chemotherapy in the context of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Gauthier, A.
    Mankouri, F.
    Demoly, P.
    Sgarbura, O.
    Chiriac, A. M.
    ALLERGY, 2020, 75 : 487 - 487
  • [32] Study protocol: phase 1 dose escalating study of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with oxaliplatin in peritoneal metastasis
    Kim, Guowei
    Tan, Hon Lyn
    Chen, Elya
    Teo, Siok Chin
    Fang, Clarisse Jia Min
    Ho, Jingshan
    Ang, Yvonne
    Li Ngoi, Natalie Yan
    Chee, Cheng Ean
    Lieske, Bettina
    Shabbir, Asim
    Wang, Ling-Zhi
    So, Jimmy Bok Yan
    Yong, Wei Peng
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2018, 3 (03)
  • [33] Performance of different nebulizers in clinical use for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Goehler, Daniel
    Oelschlaegel, Kathrin
    Ouaissi, Mehdi
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [34] Exploring the Spatial Drug Distribution Pattern of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Khosrawipour, Veria
    Khosrawipour, Tanja
    Diaz-Carballo, David
    Foerster, Eckart
    Zieren, Juergen
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 1220 - 1224
  • [35] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis
    Demtroeder, C.
    Solass, W.
    Zieren, J.
    Strumberg, D.
    Giger-Pabst, U.
    Reymond, M. -A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (04) : 364 - 371
  • [36] Radiologist Checklist for Selecting Patients to Undergo PIPAC (Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy)
    Rodolfino, Elena
    Di Marco, Margo'
    Ilot, Alessia
    Iezzi, Roberto
    Gui, Benedetta
    Avesani, Giacomo
    Panico, Camilla
    Strippoli, Antonia
    Di Giorgio, Andrea
    Pacelli, Fabio
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [37] Perioperative safety of intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Analysis of our first 111 pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) procedures
    Jansen-Winkeln, B.
    Thieme, R.
    Haase, L.
    Niebisch, S.
    Pommer, C.
    Lyros, O.
    Zimmer, J.
    Lordick, F.
    Remane, Y.
    Frontini, R.
    Gockel, I.
    CHIRURG, 2019, 90 (02): : 137 - 145
  • [38] Comparison between microcatheter and nebulizer for generating Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Toussaint, Laura
    Sautkin, Yaroslav
    Illing, Barbara
    Weinreich, Frank-Juergen
    Nadiradze, Giorgi
    Koenigsrainer, Alfred
    Wichmann, Doerte
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (04): : 1636 - 1643
  • [39] Comparison between microcatheter and nebulizer for generating Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Laura Toussaint
    Yaroslav Sautkin
    Barbara Illing
    Frank-Jürgen Weinreich
    Giorgi Nadiradze
    Alfred Königsrainer
    Dörte Wichmann
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 1636 - 1643
  • [40] Exploring the Spatial Drug Distribution Pattern of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Veria Khosrawipour
    Tanja Khosrawipour
    David Diaz-Carballo
    Eckart Förster
    Jürgen Zieren
    Urs Giger-Pabst
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 1220 - 1224