Occupational exposure to cisplatin/oxaliplatin during Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)?

被引:30
|
作者
Ametsbichler, Paul [1 ]
Boehlandt, Antje [1 ]
Nowak, Dennis [1 ]
Schierl, Rudolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst & Clin Occupat Social & Environm Med, Univ Hosp, Ziemssenstr 1, D-80336 Munich, Germany
来源
EJSO | 2018年 / 44卷 / 11期
关键词
PIPAC; Occupational exposure; Environmental monitoring; Platinum; Contamination; Peritoneal carcinomatosis; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; BODY-SURFACE-AREA; PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS; ANTINEOPLASTIC DRUGS; CONTAMINATION; SAFETY; PROGNOSIS; PLATINUM; CANCER; RISKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new promising treatment for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. It is supposed to provide a higher local drug concentration and deeper penetrate into the tumor tissue compared to systemic chemotherapy or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion (HIPEC). Due to the application of cytotoxic drug aerosols within the operating room (OR), concern has been raised regarding the occupational exposure risk of the involved OR staff. Materials and Methods: In this study, an OR workplace monitoring was performed during 14 PIPAC procedures in two hospitals by collecting air samples (n = 14) during PIPAC and wipe samples (n = 223) before and after PIPAC: 56 samples from the OR floor, 84 from the injector, 28 from trocars and 55 from gloves. All samples were analyzed for platinum (Pt). Results: While air Pt concentrations were below 3.1 pg/m(3), surface contaminations widely varied between 0.01 pg/cm(2) and 1733 pg/cm(2) (median 1.04 pg/cm(2)), with substantial Pt concentrations on injector parts (i.e. syringe holder) and trocars. Floors and particularly injectors were often higher contaminated before compared to after PIPAC, probably due to inefficient cleaning or cross-contamination. Glove samples taken after different tasks ranged between 0,04 and 423 pg/cm(2) (median 0.58 pg/cm(2)). Conclusion: Contamination on various OR surfaces widely ranged and can lead to a distribution of cytotoxic drug residues. However, the air contamination was very low. The results indicate that PIPAC performance seems to be possible with low occupational exposure risk, but adequate safety and cleaning standards for PIPAC must be developed and monitored. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1793 / 1799
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Erik, Brecelj
    Katja, Kopriva Pirtovsek
    Jani, Izlakar
    Nina, Boc
    ONKOLOGIJA, 2019, 23 (02) : 38 - 41
  • [2] Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): Occupational Health and Safety Aspects
    Solass, Wiebke
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    Zieren, Juergen
    Reymond, Marc A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (11) : 3504 - 3511
  • [3] Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): Occupational Health and Safety Aspects
    Wiebke Solaß
    Urs Giger-Pabst
    Jürgen Zieren
    Marc A. Reymond
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 3504 - 3511
  • [4] Oxaliplatin use in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is safe and effective: A multicenter study
    Sgarbura, Olivia
    Hubner, Martin
    Alyami, Mohammad
    Eveno, Clarisse
    Gagniere, Johan
    Pache, Basile
    Pocard, Marc
    Bakrin, Naoual
    Quenet, Francois
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (12): : 2386 - 2391
  • [5] Environmental safety during the administration of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Graversen, Martin
    Pedersen, Peter B.
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2016, 1 (04) : 203 - 208
  • [6] Hospitalization cost of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Tidadini, Fatah
    Trilling, Bertrand
    Aime, Adeline
    Abba, Julio
    Quesada, Jean-Louis
    Foote, Alison
    Chevallier, Thierry
    Glehen, Olivier
    Faucheron, Jean -Luc
    Chkair, Sihame
    Arvieux, Catherine
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (01): : 165 - 172
  • [7] Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) as an outpatient procedure
    Graversen, Martin
    Lundell, Lars
    Fristrup, Claus
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2018, 3 (04)
  • [8] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in a woman with pseudomyxoma peritonei: A case report
    Tempfer, Clemens B.
    Solass, Wiebke
    Buerkle, Bernd
    Reymondc, Marc-Andre
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 10 : 32 - 35
  • [9] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review
    Taliento, Cristina
    Restaino, Stefano
    Scutiero, Gennaro
    Arcieri, Martina
    Bernardi, Giulia
    Martinello, Ruby
    Driul, Lorenza
    Perrone, Anna Myriam
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Greco, Pantaleo
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_1) : A407 - A407
  • [10] A severe oxaliplatin immune-induced syndrome after oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Ezanno, Anne-Cecile
    Malgras, Brice
    Aoun, Olivier
    Delarge, Amaury
    Doreille, Alice
    Pocard, Marc
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2022, 7 (01) : 35 - 38