Response of four Salix species to soil water deficit

被引:0
|
作者
MacIvor, Ian [1 ]
Cumming, Hemi [1 ]
Hurst, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] HortRes, Palmerston North, New Zealand
来源
关键词
water-use efficiency; drought response; stomatal conductance; carbon allocation; willows;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Growth and water-use efficiency were measured over twelve weeks in potted cuttings of two tree willow species, Salix matsudana x alba 'Tangoio' and S. lucida spp lasiandra, and two shrub willow species, S. schwerinii 'Kinuyanagi' and S. lasiolepis grown in a glasshouse under three soil water regimes: well watered (WW), moderate deficit (MD) and severe deficit (SD). The shrub willows are possible alternatives to the tree willows for use in riverbank stabilisation in regions where willow sawfly Nematus oligospilus has defoliated and killed tree willows, and may be preferable for industrial applications requiring efficiency in removing water and nitrogen from soil. Dry mass accumulation was greatest in Salix matsudana x alba 'Tangoio' and lowest in S. lasiolepis in WW treatment, but differences were less in the MD and SD treatments. Whole-plant water-use efficiency (W-p), measured as dry mass accumulation divided by plant water-use, was not significantly different between MD and WW treatments. Mean dry weight gain was negative in all plants surviving the SD treatment. Carbon allocation to root growth was lowest in S. schwerinii 'Kinuyanagi' which may account for its inability to survive the SD treatment. Carbon allocation to leaf growth was significantly higher in the shrub species and allocation to stem growth was correspondingly lower.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Soil water affects transpiration response to rainfall and vapor pressure deficit in poplar plantation
    Chen, Lixin
    Zhang, Zhiqiang
    Zha, Tonggang
    Mo, Kangle
    Zhang, Yan
    Fang, Xianrui
    NEW FORESTS, 2014, 45 (02) : 235 - 250
  • [42] Thresholds for leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit in a range of sunflower genotypes
    Casadebaig, Pierre
    Debaeke, Philippe
    Lecoeur, Jeremie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 28 (04) : 646 - 654
  • [43] Soil water affects transpiration response to rainfall and vapor pressure deficit in poplar plantation
    Lixin Chen
    Zhiqiang Zhang
    Tonggang Zha
    Kangle Mo
    Yan Zhang
    Xianrui Fang
    New Forests, 2014, 45 : 235 - 250
  • [44] Response of stomatal density and bound gas exchange in leaves of maize to soil water deficit
    Wensai Zhao
    Yonglin Sun
    Roger Kjelgren
    Xiping Liu
    Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37
  • [45] Photosynthetic response of pepper plants to wilt induced by Verticillium dahliae and soil water deficit
    Pascual, I.
    Azcona, I.
    Morales, F.
    Aguirreolea, J.
    Sanchez-Diaz, M.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 167 (09) : 701 - 708
  • [46] Response of stomatal density and bound gas exchange in leaves of maize to soil water deficit
    Zhao, Wensai
    Sun, Yonglin
    Kjelgren, Roger
    Liu, Xiping
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2015, 37 (01)
  • [47] Solute accumulation and osmotic adjustment in leaves of Brassica oilseeds in response to soil water deficit
    Ma, QF
    Turner, DW
    Levy, D
    Cowling, WA
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (09): : 939 - 945
  • [48] Yield and quality of milling wheat in response to water deficit and sowing date on a shallow soil
    Minchin, R.
    Fletcher, A. L.
    Gillespie, R.
    George, M.
    Meenken, E. D.
    Shorter, S.
    Brown, H. E.
    AGRONOMY NEW ZEALAND, 2011, 2011, 41 : 49 - 58
  • [49] Response of Quercus pyrenaica (melojo oak) to soil water deficit:: a case study in Spain
    Hernandez-Santana, Virginia
    Martinez-Fernandez, Jose
    Moran, Carlos
    Cano, Ana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2008, 127 (05) : 369 - 378
  • [50] Comparison of Drought Probability Assessments Based on Atmospheric Water Deficit and Soil Water Deficit
    Torres, Guilherme M.
    Lollato, Romulo P.
    Ochsner, Tyson E.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2013, 105 (02) : 428 - 436