The comparisons of three stapler placement methods for intrathoracic mechanistic circular stapling in Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Zixiang [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Pan, Saibo [1 ]
Wang, Lian [1 ]
Shen, Gang [1 ]
Chai, Huiping [3 ]
Wu, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Thorac Surg, 88 Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Laizhou Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Thorac Surg, Taizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 218 Jixi Rd, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal carcinoma (EC); reversal penetrating technique (RPT); Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; minimally invasive esophagectomy; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC-ANASTOMOSIS; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; STRICTURE; CANCER; LEAK;
D O I
10.21037/jgo-21-322
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To analyze the impact of the reversal penetrating technique (RPT) for intrathoracic gastroesophageal mechanical anastomosis on the development of anastomotic complications in Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (ILMIE), and to further identify the risk factors for the development of anastomotic leakage and stricture. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the clinical data of 316 patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) who underwent ILMIE from January 2012 to December 2019. The participants were divided into three groups, namely the RPT group, the transoral Orvil technique (TOT) group, and the purse-string technique (PST) group, according to the different stapler placement methods for intrathoracic mechanistic circular stapling. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the association of risk factors with anastomotic leakage and stricture. Results: There were 154 patients in the RPT group, 78 in the TOT group, and 84 in the PST group for intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling in ILMIE. There were no differences in intraoperative anastomosis-related conditions including conversion of open operations, and lymph nodes harvested between the three groups. However, the mean total operative time and gastroesophageal anastomosis time in the RPT group were significantly shorter than those in the other groups (both P<0.05). The rates of anastomotic leakage and stricture showed no statistical differences between the three groups (leakage: P=0.875; stricture: P=0.942). Multivariate analysis revealed that the RPT method of anvil placement did not increase the probability of anastomotic leakage [RPT: reference; TOT: odds ratio (OR) 0.422, P=0.341; PST: OR 1.436, P=0.645] and stricture (RPT: reference; TOT: OR 0.579, P=0.376; PST: OR 1.195, P=0.755). Conclusions: The RPT method of anvil placement for intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling does not increase the risk of anastomotic complications in ILMIE, but had significantly shorter surgical time and anastomosis time.
引用
收藏
页码:1973 / 1984
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: Description of a Learning Curve
    Tapias, Luis F.
    Morse, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 218 (06) : 1130 - 1140
  • [22] Ivor Lewis robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy technique
    Yoo, Brian
    Luketich, James D.
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 6 : 1 - 5
  • [23] Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
    K. W. Maas
    S. S. A. Y. Biere
    J. J. G. Scheepers
    S. S. Gisbertz
    V. Turrado Rodriguez
    D. L. van der Peet
    M. A. Cuesta
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1795 - 1802
  • [24] Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
    Maas, K. W.
    Biere, S. S. A. Y.
    Scheepers, J. J. G.
    Gisbertz, S. S.
    Rodriguez, V. Turrado
    van der Peet, D. L.
    Cuesta, M. A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (07): : 1795 - 1802
  • [25] Pursestring Stapled Anastomotic Technique for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy
    Zhang, Ren-Quan
    Xia, Wan-Li
    Kang, Ning-Ning
    Ge, Wei
    Chen, An-Guo
    Zhu, Ke-Chao
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 94 (06): : 2133 - 2135
  • [26] Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy The Ivor Lewis Approach
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    Rizk, Nabil P.
    THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2014, 24 (02) : 211 - +
  • [27] Thoracoscopic purse string technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
    Zhang, Renquan
    Kang, Ningning
    Xia, Wanli
    Che, Yun
    Wan, Jun
    Yu, Zaicheng
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 (02) : 148 - 151
  • [28] ASO Author Reflections: Is Minimally Invasive Ivor–Lewis the Future of Esophagectomy?
    Samer A. Naffouje
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 719 - 720
  • [29] Minimally invasive vagalsparing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in esophageal stricture
    Ahn, H. Y.
    Cho, H. J. S.
    Kim, Y. D.
    CHIRURGIA-ITALY, 2015, 28 (04): : 155 - 157
  • [30] Novel T-Shaped Linear-Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy
    Dong, Yi-Nan
    Zhang, Liang
    Sun, Nan
    Liu, De-Gui
    Li, Ji-Jia
    Tong, Zhuang
    Liu, Yong-Yu
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 99 (04): : 1459 - 1463