The comparisons of three stapler placement methods for intrathoracic mechanistic circular stapling in Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Zixiang [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Pan, Saibo [1 ]
Wang, Lian [1 ]
Shen, Gang [1 ]
Chai, Huiping [3 ]
Wu, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Thorac Surg, 88 Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Laizhou Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Thorac Surg, Taizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 218 Jixi Rd, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal carcinoma (EC); reversal penetrating technique (RPT); Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; minimally invasive esophagectomy; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC-ANASTOMOSIS; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; STRICTURE; CANCER; LEAK;
D O I
10.21037/jgo-21-322
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To analyze the impact of the reversal penetrating technique (RPT) for intrathoracic gastroesophageal mechanical anastomosis on the development of anastomotic complications in Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (ILMIE), and to further identify the risk factors for the development of anastomotic leakage and stricture. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the clinical data of 316 patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) who underwent ILMIE from January 2012 to December 2019. The participants were divided into three groups, namely the RPT group, the transoral Orvil technique (TOT) group, and the purse-string technique (PST) group, according to the different stapler placement methods for intrathoracic mechanistic circular stapling. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the association of risk factors with anastomotic leakage and stricture. Results: There were 154 patients in the RPT group, 78 in the TOT group, and 84 in the PST group for intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling in ILMIE. There were no differences in intraoperative anastomosis-related conditions including conversion of open operations, and lymph nodes harvested between the three groups. However, the mean total operative time and gastroesophageal anastomosis time in the RPT group were significantly shorter than those in the other groups (both P<0.05). The rates of anastomotic leakage and stricture showed no statistical differences between the three groups (leakage: P=0.875; stricture: P=0.942). Multivariate analysis revealed that the RPT method of anvil placement did not increase the probability of anastomotic leakage [RPT: reference; TOT: odds ratio (OR) 0.422, P=0.341; PST: OR 1.436, P=0.645] and stricture (RPT: reference; TOT: OR 0.579, P=0.376; PST: OR 1.195, P=0.755). Conclusions: The RPT method of anvil placement for intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling does not increase the risk of anastomotic complications in ILMIE, but had significantly shorter surgical time and anastomosis time.
引用
收藏
页码:1973 / 1984
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
    Wee, Jon O.
    Morse, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 144 (03): : S60 - S62
  • [2] Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
    Nguyen, NT
    Follette, DM
    Lemoine, PH
    Roberts, PF
    Goodnight, JE
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (02): : 593 - 596
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy
    Gray, Katherine D.
    Molena, Daniela
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 33 (03) : 529 - 538
  • [4] End to side anastomosis with a circular stapler for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy-how I do it
    Cheong, Edward
    Luketich, James D.
    ANNALS OF ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 5
  • [5] A Prospective Study of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy With Regular Circular Stapler in Patients With Thoracic Esophageal Cancer
    Li, Hecheng
    Ma, Longfei
    Zhang, Yiliang
    Zhang, Yawei
    Xiang, Jiaqing
    Chen, Haiquan
    CHEST, 2014, 145 (03)
  • [6] Minimally invasive and robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
    Huang, Lingling
    Onaitis, Mark
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 : S314 - S321
  • [7] Technique of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy
    Pennathur, Arjun
    Awais, Omar
    Luketich, James D.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 89 (06): : S2159 - S2162
  • [8] Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy Use of the OrVIL Device for the EEA Intrathoracic Anastomosis
    Kernstine, Kemp H.
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 4 (06) : 297 - 298
  • [9] A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
    Tapias, L. F.
    Morse, C. R.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2012, 25 (05) : 449 - 455
  • [10] Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
    Bizekis, Costas
    Kent, Michael S.
    Luketich, James D.
    Buenaventura, Percival O.
    Landreneau, Rodney J.
    Schuchert, Matthew J.
    Alvelo-Rivera, Miguel
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 82 (02): : 402 - 407