Individualized treatment of preterm premature rupture of membranes to prolong the latency period, reduce the rate of preterm birth, and improve neonatal outcomes

被引:29
|
作者
Ronzoni, Stefania [1 ]
Cobo, Teresa [2 ]
D'Souza, Rohan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Asztalos, Elizabeth [6 ,7 ]
O'Rinn, Susan E. [1 ]
Cao, Xingshan [7 ,8 ]
Herranz, Ana [2 ]
Melamed, Nir [1 ]
Ferrero, Silvia [9 ]
Barrett, Jon [1 ]
Aldecoa, Victoria [2 ]
Palacio, Montse [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer, Fetal ID Fetal Med Res Ctr,Hosp Clin Barcelona BC, Barcelona Ctr Maternal Fetal & Neonatal Med, Barcelona, Spain
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Newborn & Dev Pediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Res Design & Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Hosp St Joan Deu Barcelona BCNatal, Barcelona Ctr Maternal Fetal & Neonatal Med, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
amniocentesis; antibiotic treatment; clinical chorioamnionitis; funisitis; histologic chorioamnionitis; intra-amniotic infection; maternal sepsis; microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity; neonatal short-term outcomes; personalized treatment; ACUTE HISTOLOGIC CHORIOAMNIONITIS; PRELABOR RUPTURE; INTRAAMNIOTIC INFLAMMATION; ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY; AMNIOTIC-FLUID; AMNIOCENTESIS; INFECTION; DURATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.037
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Preterm premature rupture of membranes complicates approximately 3% of pregnancies. Currently, in the absence of chorioamnionitis or placental abruption, expectant management, including antenatal steroids for lung maturation and prophylactic antibiotic treatment, is recommended. The benefits of individualized management have not been adequately explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the impact of 2 different management strategies of preterm premature rupture of membranes in 2 tertiary obstetrical centers on latency of >7 days, latency to birth, chorioamnionitis, funisitis, and short-term adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies with preterm premature rupture of membranes from 23 0/7 to 33 6/7 weeks of gestation between 2014 and 2018 and undelivered within 24 hours after hospital admission managed at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada (standard management group), and BCNatal (Hospital Clinic of Barcelona and Hospital Sant Joan de Deu Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain (individualized management group), following local protocols. The standard management group received similar management for all patients, which included a standard antibiotic regimen and routine maternal and fetal surveillance, whereas the individualized management group received personalized management on the basis of amniocentesis at hospital admission (if possible), to rule out microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and targeted treatment. The exclusion criteria were cervical dilatation >2 cm, active labor, contraindications to expectant management (acute chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, or abnormal fetal tracing), and major fetal anomalies. The primary outcome was latency of >7 days, and the secondary outcomes included latency to birth, chorioamnionitis, and short-term adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Statistical comparisons between groups were conducted with propensity score weighting. RESULTS: A total of 513 pregnancies with preterm premature rupture of membranes were included in this study: 324 patients received standard management, and 189 patients received individualized management, wherein amniocentesis was performed in 112 cases (59.3%). After propensity score weighting, patients receiving individualized management had a higher latency of >7 days (76.0% vs 41.6%; P<.001) and latency to birth (18.1 +/- 14.7 vs 9.7 +/- 9.7 days; P<.001). Although a higher rate of clinical chorioamnionitis was suspected in the individualized management group than the standard group (34.5% vs 22.0%; P<.01), there was no difference between the groups in terms of histologic chorioamnionitis (67.2% vs 73.4%; P=.16), funisitis (57.6% vs 58.1%; P=.92), or composite infectious maternal outcomes (9.1% vs 7.9%; P=.64). Prolonged latency in the individualized management group was associated with a significant reduction of preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation (72.1% vs 90.5%; P<.001), neonatal intensive care unit admission (75.6% vs 83.0%; P=.046), and neonatal respiratory support at 28 days of life (16.1% vs 26.1%; P<.01) compared with that in the standard management group. Moreover, prolonged latency was not associated with neonatal severe morbidity at discharge (survival without severe morbidity, 80.4% vs 73.5%; P=.09). CONCLUSION: Individualized management of preterm premature rupture of membranes may prolong pregnancy and reduce preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation, the need for neonatal support, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions, without an increase in histologic chorioamnionitis, funisitis, neonatal infection-related morbidity, and short-term adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prediction of the latency period by cervical length in preterm premature rupture of membranes
    Bryant, A
    Sinclair, T
    Murtha, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S104 - S104
  • [12] Factors affecting the latency period in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes
    Gidon Test
    Amalia Levy
    Arnon Wiznitzer
    Moshe Mazor
    Gershon Holcberg
    Alexander Zlotnik
    Eyal Sheiner
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 283 : 707 - 710
  • [13] Factors affecting the latency period in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes
    Test, Gidon
    Levy, Amalia
    Wiznitzer, Arnon
    Mazor, Moshe
    Holcberg, Gershon
    Zlotnik, Alexander
    Sheiner, Eyal
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 283 (04) : 707 - 710
  • [14] Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Latency in Late Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes
    Choi, Eui Kyung
    Kim, So Yeon
    Heo, Ji-Man
    Park, Kyu Hee
    Kim, Ho Yeon
    Choi, Byung Min
    Kim, Hai-Joong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (02) : 1 - 9
  • [15] Factors and outcomes associated with longer latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes
    Aziz, Natali
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (11): : 821 - 825
  • [16] Aggressive tocolysis does not prolong pregnancy or reduce neonatal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes - Discussion
    McGregor, J
    Main, E
    Laughead, M
    Barford, D
    Chavira, W
    Combs, CA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (06) : 1729 - 1731
  • [17] Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes in the Late Preterm Period
    Freeman, Sarah W.
    Denoble, Annalies
    Kuller, Jeffrey A.
    Ellestad, Sarah
    Dotters-Katz, Sarah
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2022, 77 (05) : 283 - 292
  • [18] PRETERM PREMATURE RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES: DOES THE DURATION OF LATENCY INFLUENCE NEONATAL OUTCOME?
    Manuck, Tracy
    Maclean, Courtney
    Silver, Robert
    Varner, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) : S39 - S39
  • [19] Contemporary management of preterm premature rupture of membranes: Determinants of latency and neonatal outcome
    Gopalani, S
    Krohn, M
    Meyn, L
    Hitti, J
    Crombleholme, WR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2004, 21 (04) : 183 - 190
  • [20] Defining the Sociodemographic Impact on the Latency Period Following Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes
    Lambert, Calvin
    Ranjit, Anju
    McDonalck, Vanessa
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 18S - 19S