Biomarkers in prostate cancer - Current clinical utility and future perspectives

被引:122
|
作者
Kretschmer, Alexander [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tilki, Derya [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Prostate Canc Ctr, Martini Klin, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Biomarker; Prostate cancer; Molecular marker; Genetic marker; Prognostic; Predictive; CYCLE PROGRESSION SCORE; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PATIENT-DERIVED XENOGRAFTS; NEEDLE-BIOPSY SPECIMENS; CIRCULATING TUMOR-CELLS; GENE-EXPRESSION ASSAY; GENOMIC CLASSIFIER; REPEAT BIOPSY; HEALTH INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.11.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Current tendencies in the treatment course of prostate cancer patients increase the need for reliable biomarkers that help in decision-making in a challenging clinical setting. Within the last decade, several novel biomarkers have been introduced. In the following comprehensive review article, we focus on diagnostic (PHI (R), 4K score, SelectMDx (R), ConfirmMDx (R), PCA3, MiPS, ExoDX (R) mpMRI) and prognostic (OncotypeDX GPS (R) Prolaris (R), ProMark (R), DNA-ploidy, Decipher (R)) biomarkers that are in widespread clinical use and are supported by evidence. Hereby, we focus on multiple clinical situations in which innovative biomarkers may guide decision-making in prostate cancer therapy. In addition, we describe novel liquid biopsy approaches (circulating tumor cells, cell-free DNA) that have been described as predictive biomarkers in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and might support an individual patient-centred oncological approach in the nearer future.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 193
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Novel Biomarkers of Gastric Cancer: Current Research and Future Perspectives
    Sato, Yasushi
    Okamoto, Koichi
    Kawano, Yutaka
    Kasai, Akinari
    Kawaguchi, Tomoyuki
    Sagawa, Tamotsu
    Sogabe, Masahiro
    Miyamoto, Hiroshi
    Takayama, Tetsuji
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (14)
  • [22] Perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [23] Prostate cancer proteomics: clinically useful protein biomarkers and future perspectives
    Intasqui, Paula
    Bertolla, Ricardo P.
    Sadi, Marcus Vinicius
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS, 2018, 15 (01) : 65 - 79
  • [24] Minimally invasive surgery in prostate cancer: Current and future perspectives
    Akduman, B
    Barqawi, AB
    Crawford, ED
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (05): : 355 - 361
  • [25] Hormonal therapy for prostate cancer: Current topics and future perspectives
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    Hinotsu, Shiro
    Akaza, Hideyuki
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Kihara, Kazunori
    Akakura, Koichiro
    Suzuki, Motofumi
    Kitamura, Tadaichi
    Homma, Yukio
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) : 302 - 313
  • [26] Current Role and Future Perspectives of Hyperthermia for Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Baronzio, Gianfranco
    Gramaglia, Alberto
    Fiorentini, Gianmaria
    IN VIVO, 2009, 23 (01): : 143 - 146
  • [27] Proton therapy for prostate cancer: current state and future perspectives
    Wu, Yao-Yu
    Fan, Kang-Hsing
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1131):
  • [28] Focal therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future perspectives
    Miano, R.
    Asimakopoulos, A. D.
    Da Silva, R. D.
    Bove, P.
    Jones, S. J.
    De La Rosette, J. J.
    Kim, F. J.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2015, 67 (03) : 263 - 280
  • [29] Hormone refractory prostate cancer: Current understanding and future perspectives
    Khochikar, Makarand
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 23 (01) : 34 - 34
  • [30] Biomarkers: current perspectives and future prospects
    Naylor, S
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2003, 3 (05) : 525 - 529