Molecular diagnostics of sepsis - Where are we today?

被引:57
|
作者
Bauer, Michael [1 ]
Reinhart, Konrad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Jena, Klin Anasthesiol & Intensivtherapie, D-07743 Jena, Germany
关键词
Transcriptomics; Proteomics; Nucleic acid amplification; Polymerase chain reaction; Infection; Critical care; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; TIME PCR ASSAY; ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT; BINDING DOMAIN; IDENTIFICATION; DNA; BACTERIAL; THERAPY; IMPACT; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.006
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rapid diagnosis of sepsis is of outstanding significance as each hour of delay of appropriate antimicrobial therapy increases mortality by 5-10%. As a result, antibiotics are started without a definitive microbial result based on clinical signs in concert with "biomarkers" with high sensitivity but a lack of specificity. Diagnostic uncertainty is compensated for by liberal use of broad spectrum antibiotics with inherent resistance as an increasing public-health problem. Blood culture reflects the current gold-standard but is positive only in approximately 20% of cases and even if positive, results are obtained too late to influence decision making. Culture-independent microbial nucleic acid amplification techniques may allow ways out of this dilemma. In addition to diagnosis of infection, "biomarkers" reflecting the host response can provide valuable information regarding prognosis, course, and response to treatment. Among available single protein markers, procalcitonin (PCT) covers these features best and a PCT-based therapeutic strategy carries potential to reduce antibiotic courses even in life-threatening infections. Recent data from transcriptomic and/or proteomic profiling would, however, indicate that marker panels derived from transcriptomic or proteomic profiling are superior to single proteins to differentiate non-infectious from sepsis-associated systemic inflammation. Multiplexed assay systems, e.g. after platform transfer from whole-genomic chips to multiplexed quantitative PCR are currently being developed with potential to improve sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility of both, molecular tests to identify the pathogen and the ensuing host response, has still to be evaluated in prospective trials. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 413
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Molecular basis of Unverricht-Lundborg disease: Where are we today?
    Lehesjoki, A.
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 231 - 231
  • [22] Pediatric Sepsis Research: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
    Massaud-Ribeiro, Leticia
    Silami, Pedro Henrique Nunes Costa
    Lima-Setta, Fernanda
    Prata-Barbosa, Arnaldo
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [23] MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS FOR INFECTIOUS-DISEASES - WHERE DO WE STAND
    TELENTI, A
    CLINICAL INVESTIGATOR, 1994, 72 (06): : 415 - 416
  • [24] Targeted therapy for cancer: where we are today and where we are heading
    Melville, Graeme
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (22) : 3065 - 3067
  • [25] Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Where are We Today, Where will We be Tomorrow?
    Richards, Kyle A.
    Kader, A. Karim
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2010, 10 : 2215 - 2227
  • [26] Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Where we are today and where we're going
    Lopez, Isabel
    Forster, Jorge
    REVISTA MEDICA CLINICA LAS CONDES, 2022, 33 (04): : 367 - 378
  • [27] Liver Transplantation Today: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going
    Bodzin, Adam S.
    Baker, Talia B.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 24 (10) : 1470 - 1475
  • [28] Ultrafast Spectroscopy of Photoactive Molecular Systems from First Principles: Where We Stand Today and Where We Are Going
    Conti, Irene
    Cerullo, Giulio
    Nenov, Artur
    Garavelli, Marco
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 142 (38) : 16117 - 16139
  • [30] Oncoplastic surgery in the USA: a review of where we started, where we are today and where we are headed
    Willcox, Lauren M.
    Losken, Albert
    Nores, Gabriela del Pilar Garcia
    GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (05) : 749 - 759