Regulatory approaches to, and practice of, PSA in Finland, France, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America

被引:0
|
作者
Baier, M [1 ]
Schaefer, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Safety & Reliabil, D-85478 Garching, Germany
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Performing level-1 probabilistic safety analyses (PSA) is the established standard in most countries using nuclear power. In addition, level-2 PSA has become more and more widespread over the past few years. However, regulatory requirements and practice differ from country to country, especially with respect to level-2 analyses. In an effort to determine these differences more precisely, the ISaR Institute for Safety and Reliability, on behalf of VGB PowerTech Service GmbH, conducted a study of these seven countries: Finland, France, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The study focused on level-2 PSA carried out by plant operators within the framework of periodic safety reviews. The findings of the study are based on extensive interviews of at least one expert each on the operators' and the authorities' sides for each of the seven countries. Points taken into account in particular included the criteria imposed by regulators on PSA carried out by operators; the rank of PSA within the regulatory framework; the required versus the actual scopes of analysis; the objectives and uses of PSA; reviews of the analyse; the methods employed.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Framing the Newspaper Crisis: How debates on the state of the press are shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States
    Brueggemann, Michael
    Humprecht, Edda
    Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis
    Karppinen, Kari
    Cornia, Alessio
    Esser, Frank
    JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2016, 17 (05) : 533 - 551
  • [42] Prevalence and incidence of dilated cardiomyopathy in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom: a systematic literature review
    Myers, M. C.
    Berge, A.
    Zhong, Y.
    Maruyama, S.
    Bueno, C.
    Bastien, A.
    Hofer, K.
    Kaur, R.
    Fazeli, M. S.
    Golchin, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2024, 26 : 103 - 103
  • [43] MILITARY COOPERATION OF SPAIN WITH FRANCE AND UNITED STATES
    不详
    EUROPA ARCHIV, 1970, 25 (20): : D481 - D492
  • [44] When safety is relative: Ecological modernisation theory and the nuclear safety regulatory regimes of France, the United Kingdom and United States
    Toke, David
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 86
  • [45] The Practice of Neurology in the United States of America
    Bailey, Percival
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, 1946, 21 (05): : 281 - 292
  • [46] United States of America - Practice guidelines: To be or not to be
    Brook, RH
    LANCET, 1996, 348 (9033): : 1005 - 1006
  • [47] A COMPARISON OF REGULATORY APPROVAL TIMES FOR NEW CHEMICAL ENTITIES IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, SWEDEN, THE UNITED-KINGDOM, AND THE UNITED-STATES
    PIETERSON, EA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 32 (10): : 889 - 896
  • [48] Does paying child support impoverish fathers in the United States, Finland, and the United Kingdom?
    Hakovirta, Mia
    Meyer, Daniel R.
    Skinner, Christine
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2019, 106
  • [49] A Comparison of Hospice in the United States and the United Kingdom Implications for Policy and Practice
    Remington, Ruth
    Wakim, Grace
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2010, 36 (09): : 16 - 21
  • [50] Differences in pharmacy terminology and practice between the United Kingdom and the United States
    Brock, Tina Penick
    Franklin, Bryony Dean
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2007, 64 (14) : 1541 - 1546