Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography

被引:11
|
作者
Petropoulos, Andreas E. [1 ]
Skiadopoulos, Spyros G. [1 ]
Karahaliou, Anna N. [1 ]
Messaris, Gerasimos A. T. [2 ]
Arikidis, Nikolaos S. [1 ]
Costaridou, Lena I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Patras 26504, Greece
[2] Univ Hosp Patras, Dept Med Phys, Patras 26504, Greece
关键词
Digital mammography; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Synthetic 2D images; Microcalcification cluster; Signal-difference-to-noise ratio; PERFORMANCE; DBT; 2D; TEXTURE; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1007/s11517-019-02072-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Quantitative assessment of microcalcification (MC) cluster image quality is presented, in terms of cluster signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) intercomparison among digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2-dimensional (2D) and synthetic-2-dimensional (s2D) mammography. A phantom that provides realistic appearance of MC clusters located in uniform and nonuniform background was imaged in 2D and DBT, considering various scattering conditions. MC cluster SDNR differentiation is investigated with respect to MC particle size (uniform background) and surrounding parenchyma density (nonuniform background). An accurate MC cluster segmentation method was used to delineate individual MC particles and estimate MC cluster SDNR. Analysis of the uniform part of the phantom indicated higher performance of DBT and 2D over s2D for the smallest cluster size (106-177 mu m), no difference among mammographic modes for the largest MC cluster (224-354 mu m), and enhanced role of 2D for decreasing cluster size and increasing scattering. Analysis of the nonuniform part of the phantom indicated DBT performed better than 2D and s2D in case of dense parenchyma pattern, while 2D and s2D did not differ across parenchyma density patterns and scattering conditions. The presented MC cluster SDNR analysis was capable of revealing subtle differences among mammographic modes and suggests a methodology for clinical image quality assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 209
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, two-dimensional digital mammography and two-dimensional screening mammography (film-screen)
    MJ Michell
    RK Wasan
    P Whelehan
    A Iqbal
    CP Lawinski
    AN Donaldson
    DR Evans
    C Peacock
    ARM Wilson
    Breast Cancer Research, 11 (Suppl 2)
  • [22] Digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, two-dimensional digital mammography and two-dimensional screening mammography (film-screen)
    Michell, M. J.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Whelehan, P.
    Iqbal, A.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Donaldson, A. N.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Wilson, A. R. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 11
  • [23] Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-dimensional Mammography
    Korporaal, Johannes G.
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (03) : 980 - 981
  • [24] Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: A 4AFC human observer study
    Timberg, P.
    Bath, M.
    Andersson, I.
    Mattsson, S.
    Tingberg, A.
    Ruschin, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2431 - 2437
  • [25] Ultrasound-guided Mammotome® biopsy for breast microcalcification using 2-dimensional mammography localization
    Yom, C.
    Koo, M.
    Moon, B.
    Park, Y.
    BREAST, 2009, 18 : S23 - S24
  • [26] Task-based detectability in anatomical background in digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography
    Monnin, P.
    Damet, J.
    Bosmans, H.
    Marshall, N. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (02):
  • [27] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Synthetic Mammography: Are We Missing Calcifications That Matter?
    Nguyen, Adrien
    Mirchandani, Anicia
    Joseph, Sumita
    Mapkar, Zaiba
    Singh, Evita
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (06) : 666 - 674
  • [28] Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Mariscotti, Giovanna
    Durando, Manuela
    Stevanin, Carmen
    Tagliafico, Giulio
    Martino, Lucia
    Bignotti, Bianca
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Houssami, Nehmat
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [29] Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study
    Alberto Tagliafico
    Giovanna Mariscotti
    Manuela Durando
    Carmen Stevanin
    Giulio Tagliafico
    Lucia Martino
    Bianca Bignotti
    Massimo Calabrese
    Nehmat Houssami
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 9 - 14
  • [30] Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Young
    Kim, Ga Ram
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Park, Ko Woon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 319 - 329