Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Zhenxiao [1 ]
Liu, Yun [1 ]
Wang, Line [1 ]
Shen, Xixi [1 ]
Han, Shuguang [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Gao, Fenqi [1 ]
Liang, Wenqi [1 ]
Peng, Kevin A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 95th Yongan Rd, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
[2] House Clin, 2100 W 3rd St,Suite 111, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
关键词
Cochlear nerve canal stenosis (CNCs); Cochlear implantation (CI); Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR); Cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT); CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.10.029
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the characteristics of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) in children with cochlear nerve canal stenosis (CNCs) following cochlear implantation (CI), and the EABR thresholds in children with stenotic versus normal cochlear nerve canals. Method: Sixteen children with profound sensorineural hearing loss were included in this study: 8 with CNCs (CNCs group) and 8 with normal cochlear nerve canals (control group). All children underwent cochlear implantation with full insertion of all electrodes. EABR was performed 6 months postoperatively in both groups. Results: The EABR extraction rate was 100% in children with normal cochlear nerve canals and only 50% in children with CNCs. EABR thresholds were significantly higher in children with CNCs of electrodes No. 11 and 22 than in children with normal cochlear nerve canals (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). There was no significant difference in EABR thresholds among electrode No. 1, 11 and 22 in CNCs group (P > 0.05 for all comparisons); while in the control group, the EABR threshold at electrode No 22 was lower than those at both electrodes No. 11 and 1 (P < 0.05 for both comparisons), and the EABR threshold at electrode No. 11 was also lower than that at electrode No. 1 (P < 0.05). Conclusion The EABR thresholds in children with normal cochlear nerve canals vary according to the different locations of electrodes in the cochlea; while in children with CNCs, there was no significant difference among different electrode locations. The EABR thresholds in CNCs children were higher than those of children with normal cochlear nerve canals at electrode 11 and 22.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 103
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders: role of transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and serial neural response telemetry
    Dutt, S. N.
    Kumar, A.
    Mittal, A. A.
    Vadlamani, S.
    Gaur, S. K.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2021, 135 (07): : 602 - 609
  • [42] Relationship Between Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response and Auditory Performance After Cochlear Implant in Patients With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
    Jeon, Ju Hyun
    Bae, Mi Ran
    Song, Mee Hyun
    Noh, Seung Hwan
    Choi, Ki Hoon
    Choi, Jae Young
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (07) : 1261 - 1266
  • [43] COCHLEAR IMPLANT ARTIFACT REJECTION IN ELECTRICALLY EVOKED AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSES
    Deprez, Hanne
    Hofmann, Michael
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    Wouters, Jan
    Moonen, Marc
    2014 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2014, : 1995 - 1999
  • [44] Hypoplasia of the cochlear nerve in the internal auditory canal
    Shu, Min-Tsan
    Lin, Hung-Ching
    Chen, Yu-Chun
    Huang, Jon-Kway
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (07) : 990 - 991
  • [45] Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations
    Kim, Ana H.
    Kileny, Paul R.
    Arts, H. Alexander
    El-Kashlan, Hussam K.
    Telian, Steven A.
    Zwolan, Terry A.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (05) : 626 - 634
  • [46] Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users
    Cavalle Garrido, Laura
    Schwarz, Konrad
    Lauss, Kathrin
    de Paula Vernetta, Carlos
    Kontides, Alejandra
    Diaz Gomez, Miguel
    Guzman Calvete, Abel
    Armengot Carceller, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2018, 14 (03): : 353 - 358
  • [47] Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve via cochlear implants in patients with auditory neuropathy
    Sininger, YS
    Trautwein, P
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 111 (05): : 29 - 31
  • [48] Auditory brainstem implant in posttraumatic cochlear nerve avulsion
    Colletti, V
    Carner, M
    Miorelli, V
    Colletti, L
    Guida, M
    Fiorino, F
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2004, 9 (04) : 247 - 255
  • [49] Effect of unilateral cochlear implant use on contralateral electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses to round window membrane electrical stimulation
    Zhang, Jun-Ge
    Chen, Li
    Li, Ping
    Sun, Jing-Wu
    Guo, Xiao-Tao
    Sun, Jia-Qiang
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2021, 141 (06) : 588 - 593
  • [50] The Precision of Neuronal Coding in the Auditory Brainstem and Implications for Cochlear Implants
    Wang, H.
    Holmberg, M.
    Hemmert, W.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 25, PT 11: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING FOR AUDIOLOGY, OPHTHALMOLOGY, EMERGENCY AND DENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 25 (11): : 68 - +