Pain measurement during labor: comparing the visual analog scale with dermatome assessment

被引:12
|
作者
Winkelman, Chris [1 ]
Norman, David [2 ]
Maloni, Judith A. [1 ]
Kless, Jack R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Naval Hosp Twentynine, Palms, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.apnr.2006.05.002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this article is to examine the agreement between two measures of pain in laboring women who receive epidural analgesia for relief to support validity and reliability of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in this population. Background: There are several different approaches to measuring pain in laboring women. However, the psychometric proper-ties of pain relief measures in this population are not well established. This investigation examines agreement (i.e., concordance) between the visual analog scale for pain sensation and sensation measured by dermatome level assessment. Method: Fifty pregnant women in labor who underwent epidural placement recorded their sensation of pain on the VAS simultaneously with the certified nurse anesthetist recording sensation by using a standard dermatome chart after administration of epidural analgesia. Results: There was moderate, significant correlation between the two measures. However, agreement between the two measures did not meet preset standards with Bland-Altman analysis, suggesting that one measure cannot be substituted for the other. Overall, the average dermatome levels alone underestimated pain in laboring women as recorded by the VAS, although both under- and overestimation of pain relief occurred during the series of observations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 109
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] VISUAL ANALOG PAIN SCALE WITH CONVENIENT DIGITIZER
    WATANABE, S
    KOYAMA, K
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 71 (03) : 481 - 481
  • [22] The pain visual analog scale: Is it linear or nonlinear?
    Myles, PS
    Troedel, S
    Boquest, M
    Reeves, M
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (06): : 1517 - 1520
  • [23] Visual analog scale pain reporting was standardized
    Kane, RL
    Bershadsky, B
    Rockwood, T
    Saleh, K
    Islam, NC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (06) : 618 - 623
  • [24] Statistical analysis of total labor pain using the visual analog scale and application to studies of analgesic effectiveness during childbirth - In response
    Dexter, F
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (05): : 1194 - 1194
  • [25] The visual time analog scale: simple, novel measurement approach to assess pain in patients with chronic pain
    Okifuji, Akiko
    Mitsunaga, Reiko
    Kida, Yuri
    Donaldson, Gary W.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2021, 11 (04) : 357 - 368
  • [26] Do visual analog scale pain scores change during a rheumatologist visit
    Trèves, R
    Scotto, C
    Bertin, P
    Bonnet, C
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2002, 69 (02) : 234 - 235
  • [27] Visual Analog Scale and Pressure Pain Threshold for Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness Assessment
    Lau, Wing Yin
    Muthalib, Makii
    Nosaka, Kazunori
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN, 2013, 21 (04): : 320 - 326
  • [28] Observational visual analog scale in pediatric pain assessment: Useful tool or good riddance?
    van Dijk, M
    Koot, HM
    Abu Saad, HH
    Tibboel, D
    Passchier, J
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2002, 18 (05): : 310 - 316
  • [29] ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN .1. ASPECTS OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE
    CARLSSON, AM
    PAIN, 1983, 16 (01) : 87 - 101
  • [30] Unreliability of the Visual Analog Scale in Experimental Pain Assessment: A Sensitivity and Evoked Potentials Study
    Kemp, Jennifer
    Despres, Olivier
    Dufour, Andre
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2012, 15 (05) : E693 - E699