Pain measurement during labor: comparing the visual analog scale with dermatome assessment

被引:12
|
作者
Winkelman, Chris [1 ]
Norman, David [2 ]
Maloni, Judith A. [1 ]
Kless, Jack R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Naval Hosp Twentynine, Palms, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.apnr.2006.05.002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this article is to examine the agreement between two measures of pain in laboring women who receive epidural analgesia for relief to support validity and reliability of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in this population. Background: There are several different approaches to measuring pain in laboring women. However, the psychometric proper-ties of pain relief measures in this population are not well established. This investigation examines agreement (i.e., concordance) between the visual analog scale for pain sensation and sensation measured by dermatome level assessment. Method: Fifty pregnant women in labor who underwent epidural placement recorded their sensation of pain on the VAS simultaneously with the certified nurse anesthetist recording sensation by using a standard dermatome chart after administration of epidural analgesia. Results: There was moderate, significant correlation between the two measures. However, agreement between the two measures did not meet preset standards with Bland-Altman analysis, suggesting that one measure cannot be substituted for the other. Overall, the average dermatome levels alone underestimated pain in laboring women as recorded by the VAS, although both under- and overestimation of pain relief occurred during the series of observations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 109
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual analog scale scores for labor pain
    Camann, W
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (06): : 1421 - 1421
  • [2] Comparison of visual analog pain scale (VAPS) and verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) for pain assessment during labor analgesia
    Misa, VS
    Pan, PH
    Owen, MD
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (05) : A9 - A9
  • [3] Assessment of visual analog versus categorical scale for measurement of osteoarthritis pain
    Averbuch, M
    Katzper, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 44 (04): : 368 - 372
  • [4] Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain
    Bijur, PE
    Silver, W
    Gallagher, EJ
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (12) : 1153 - 1157
  • [5] THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE - ITS USE IN PAIN MEASUREMENT
    LANGLEY, GB
    SHEPPEARD, H
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 5 (04) : 145 - 148
  • [6] Assessment of visual analog versus categorical scale for measurement of osteoarthritis acute pain.
    Averbuch, M
    Katzper, M
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 75 (02) : P4 - P4
  • [7] MEASUREMENT OF PAIN - COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUAL ANALOG SCALE AND ANALOG CHROMATIC CONTINUOUS SCALE
    GROSSI, E
    BORGHI, C
    MONTANARI, M
    ADVANCES IN PAIN RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1985, 9 : 371 - 376
  • [8] Preferred Presentation of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Postoperative Pain
    Kjeldsen, Helle Birgitte
    Klausen, Tobias Wirenfeldt
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (08) : 980 - 984
  • [9] VISUAL ANALOG MEASUREMENT OF PAIN
    CAMPBELL, WI
    LEWIS, S
    ULSTER MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 59 (02): : 149 - 154
  • [10] Association Between Type of Face Mask and Visual Analog Scale Scores During Pain Assessment
    Ben Natan, Merav
    Steinfeld, Yaniv
    Badash, Sara
    Shmilov, Galina
    Abramov, Milena
    Epstein, Danny
    Yonai, Yaniv
    Berbalek, Eyal
    Berkovich, Yaron
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2022, 23 (03) : 370 - 373