Improved Fertility Preservation Care for Male Patients With Cancer After Establishment of Formalized Oncofertility Program

被引:65
|
作者
Sheth, Kunj R. [1 ]
Sharma, Vidit [1 ]
Helfand, Brian T. [1 ]
Cashy, John [1 ]
Smith, Kristin [2 ]
Hedges, Jason C. [1 ]
Koehler, Tobias S. [3 ]
Woodruff, Teresa K. [2 ]
Brannigant, Robert E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] So Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2012年 / 187卷 / 03期
关键词
testis; neoplasms; infertility; male; sperm; cryopreservation; TESTICULAR CANCER; SURVIVORS; BARRIERS; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.154
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Survival to reproductive age among men with cancer has steadily increased and yet cancer therapy and cancer itself may carry the risk of infertility. Since 2006, we have used a formalized fertility preservation program with expedited fertility care at our institution. We assessed the impact of this program by comparing the frequency of sperm cryopreservation and patient characteristics before and after its implementation. Materials and Methods: Men 18 to 55 years old diagnosed with cancer at our institution from 2002 to 2010 were included in our study. We retrospectively reviewed patient charts to identify those who were offered and subsequently used fertility preservation services before and after program formalization. Results: From 2002 to 2010 at our institution 4,818 men 18 to 55 years old were diagnosed with cancer, of whom 411 were offered fertility preservation consultation and 249 underwent sperm cryopreservation. Since program implementation, the annual number of men receiving fertility preservation consultation and undergoing sperm cryopreservation increased by 2.4 and 2.7-fold, respectively, while the total number diagnosed with cancer remained fairly constant. Upon substratifying patients into the more conventional reproductive age range of 18 to 40 years 23.4% of all men with cancer in this group were offered consultation before formalization vs 43.3% after formalization (p<0.05). The overall sperm use and discard rates were 8.4% and 14.8%, respectively. Conclusions: A formalized institutional fertility preservation program significantly increased the overall number and percent of male patients with cancer who received fertility preservation consultation and pursued sperm cryopreservation. These increases were seen in men with all types of cancer and across all demographics assessed at our institution.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 986
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Consult and procedure incidence outcomes following establishment of a fertility preservation program for children with cancer
    Behl, Supriya
    Joshi, Vidhu B.
    Hussein, Reda S.
    Walker, David L.
    Lampat, Kari L.
    Krenik, Anthony G.
    Barud, Kathrynne M.
    Fredrickson, Jolene R.
    Galanits, Terri M.
    Rian, Katherine J.
    Delgado, Adriana M.
    Byrne, Julia H.
    Potter, Dean, Jr.
    Pittock, Siobhan T.
    Arndt, Carola A. S.
    Zhao, Yulian
    Gargollo, Patricio C.
    Granberg, Candace F.
    Khan, Zaraq
    Chattha, Asma J.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (02) : 495 - 501
  • [42] Patients undergoing elective and oncofertility preservation respond similarly to controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
    Frare Kira, Ariane Tieko
    Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro
    de Vasconcelos, Natalia Fontoura
    Colombo, Talita
    Trindade, Vanessa Devens
    Petracco, Alvaro
    Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercilia
    Badalotti, Mariangela
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2022, 26 (03): : 407 - 411
  • [43] RACIAL DISPARITIES IN ACCESS TO FERTILITY PRESERVATION FOR ONCOFERTILITY PATIENTS ARE ALLEVIATED IN THE SETTING OF A COMPREHENSIVE FERTILITY MANDATE.
    So, Melody
    Koniares, Katherine
    Godiwala, Prachi N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (04) : E266 - E266
  • [44] Development of a Pediatric Fertility Preservation Program: A Report From the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium
    Moravek, Molly B.
    Appiah, Leslie C.
    Anazodo, Antoinette
    Burns, Karen C.
    Gomez-Lobo, Veronica
    Hoefgen, Holly R.
    Frias, Olivia Jaworek
    Laronda, Monica M.
    Levine, Jennifer
    Meacham, Lillian R.
    Pavone, Mary Ellen
    Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
    Rowell, Erin E.
    Strine, Andrew C.
    Woodruff, Teresa K.
    Nahata, Leena
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2019, 64 (05) : 563 - 573
  • [45] Raising the Bar of Oncofertility Care in HSCT Patients: Implementation of an Oncofertility Education and Referral Program
    Spencer, Hannah E.
    Barkley, Geoffrey
    Smith, Laura P.
    Locker, Gana Elizabeth
    Rexrode, Diana O.
    Beitinjaneh, Amer
    Volodin, Leonid
    Huntsinger, Lisa
    Kindwall-Keller, Tamila L.
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (02) : S182 - S182
  • [46] Low utilization of fertility preservation among Chinese male cancer patients
    Fu, Longlong
    Zhang, Kaishu
    An, Qi
    Zhou, Fang
    Lu, Wenhong
    Liang, Xiaowei
    Gu, Yiqun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (09): : 9916 - 9920
  • [47] REGRET REGARDING FERTILITY PRESERVATION DECISIONS AMONG MALE CANCER PATIENTS
    Walker, Kelly
    Ramstein, Joris
    Smith, James
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E680 - E681
  • [48] Quebec public funding facilitates fertility preservation for male cancer patients
    Herrero, M. B.
    Garcia, A.
    Buckett, W.
    Tulandi, T.
    Chan, P.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [49] Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes
    Kimelman, Dana
    Torrens, Andrea
    Bonelli, Carla
    Sapiro, Rossana
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [50] Fertility preservation: an emerging discipline in the care of young patients with cancer
    Oktay, K
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (04): : 192 - 193