Quantitative evaluation of landscape architecture environmental benefits based on multi-criteria decision-making

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Shuhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Coll Art & Design, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China
关键词
multi-criteria decision making; landscape environment; benefit; quantitative evaluation; GIS;
D O I
10.1504/IJETM.2022.120728
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aiming at the problems of large spatial accuracy error and long evaluation time in the quantitative evaluation of environmental benefits of landscape architecture, a new research method for quantitative evaluation of environmental benefits of landscape architecture is proposed. The grey relational analysis method is used to calculate the weights of environmental benefit evaluation indexes and establish an evaluation index system. The multi-dimensional decision-making method is applied to the construction of the environmental benefit decision matrix. After the index weights are clarified, the weighted decision matrix is established to calculate the distance of the standard solutions of different environmental benefit evaluation indexes to obtain the quantitative assessment results of environmental benefits. Comparative experiments show that the spatial accuracy error is no more than 4%, the change curve of the environmental benefit evaluation index is relatively close to the average change curve, and the benefit evaluation time is less than 2 s.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 107
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria decision-making in the evaluation of environmental quality of OECD countries The entropy weight and VIKOR methods
    Van Thac Dang
    Dang, Wilson V. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) : 119 - 130
  • [42] Ranking based on optimal points multi-criteria decision-making method
    Zakeri, Shervin
    GREY SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2019, 9 (01) : 45 - 69
  • [43] Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Liu, Hua-Wen
    Wang, Guo-Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 179 (01) : 220 - 233
  • [44] Linguistic multi-criteria decision-making method based on emotion perception
    Zhou J.
    Xiao F.
    Du N.
    Yan X.-Y.
    Sun L.-J.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2020, 35 (08): : 1945 - 1952
  • [45] Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on prospect theory
    Chen L.
    Luo N.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2020, 40 (03): : 726 - 735
  • [46] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [47] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Scheduling
    Saroja, S.
    Revathi, T.
    Auluck, Nitin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (05) : 1399 - 1427
  • [48] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [49] A Model for Linguistic Dynamic Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Jiang, Le
    Liu, Hongbin
    Martinez, Luis
    Cai, Jianfeng
    FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ISKE 2013), 2014, 277 : 939 - 949
  • [50] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421