Failed reciprocity in social exchange and wellbeing: evidence from a longitudinal dyadic study in the disability setting

Objectives: Failed reciprocity at work and in partnerships was shown to adversely affect wellbeing in general populations, but evidence in disability settings is widely lacking. We explore the effects of failed reciprocity on wellbeing and the impact of the partners' perception of reciprocity on wellbeing in persons with a physical disability and their partners. Design: We use longitudinal dyadic data from the pro-WELL study, a Swiss survey of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their partners (n = 246). Two-level mixed-models with random effects for persons and repeated measures were applied. Main outcome measures: Cognitive wellbeing was measured with the Satisfaction with Life Scale and affective wellbeing with the Positive and Negative Affect Scale short-form. Results: Failed reciprocity at work and in the partnership was associated with all indicators of wellbeing in persons with SCI and with cognitive wellbeing and negative affect in caregiving partners. Life satisfaction of caregiving partners and positive affect of persons with SCI was lower if the partner perceived the partnership as non-reciprocal. Conclusion: Negative associations of failed reciprocity with wellbeing are not restricted to general populations but equally apply to the disability setting and dyadic analyses reveal the importance of the partners' perception of partnership reciprocity for wellbeing.