Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers

被引:132
|
作者
Waters, AJ
Shiffman, S
Bradley, BP
Mogg, K
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
attentional bias; craving; cue reactivity; smoking cues;
D O I
10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00465.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Many theories of addiction assume that responses to drug cues maintain drug use and precipitate relapse. There is evidence that measures derived from experimental cognitive psychology yield important information about cue reactivity. We used a pictorial version of the visual probe task to evaluate: (i) whether minimally deprived smokers attend differentially to smoking cues (attentional bias): (ii) whether this bias is related to self-reported craving and dependence; and (iii) whether it predicted outcome in a subsequent cessation attempt. Design Participants took part in a structured smoking cessation program. Each participant completed the visual probe task roughly 2 weeks before quitting while non-deprived. Setting A research smoking cessation clinic. Participants 141 heavy smokers seeking treatment for smoking cessation. Measurements The computerized attentional bias measure and self-reported urge were taken in a laboratory session. Participants also monitored their smoking and craving on electronic diaries both when smoking ad libitum and for up to 6 weeks post-cessation. Findings Participants were faster and more accurate in responding to a visual probe that replaced a smoking picture than to a neutral picture, indicating that they showed attentional bias towards the smoking cues. Attentional bias on the first half of the task correlated with pre-task craving, indicating that the bias may tap motivational processes, but it did not predict outcome in smoking cessation. Conclusions The visual probe task can add useful information about attentional responses to drug cues. Further work is required to uncover the theoretical significance and utility of this measure.
引用
收藏
页码:1409 / 1417
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The smoking Stroop and delay discounting in smokers: effects of environmental smoking cues
    Field, Matt
    Rush, Michelle
    Cole, Jon
    Goudie, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 603 - 610
  • [32] Craving effect of smoking cues in smoking and antismoking stimuli in light smokers
    Salgado-Garcia, Francisco I.
    Cooper, Theodore V.
    Taylor, Thom
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2013, 38 (10) : 2492 - 2499
  • [33] Goal-driven attentional capture by appetitive and aversive smoking-related cues in nicotine-dependent smokers
    Brown, Chris R. H.
    Forster, Sophie
    Duka, Theodora
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2018, 190 : 209 - 215
  • [34] Effect of tryptophan depletion on the attentional salience of smoking cues
    Hitsman, Brian
    Spring, Bonnie
    Pingitore, Regina
    Munafo, Marcus
    Hedeker, Donald
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 192 (03) : 317 - 324
  • [35] Effect of tryptophan depletion on the attentional salience of smoking cues
    Brian Hitsman
    Bonnie Spring
    Regina Pingitore
    Marcus Munafò
    Donald Hedeker
    Psychopharmacology, 2007, 192 : 317 - 324
  • [36] Attentional bias to smoking cues: ERP and genetic correlates
    Evans, David E.
    Farag, Marian N.
    Oliver, Jason A.
    Maxfield, Nathan
    Park, Jong Y.
    Drobes, David J.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 45 : S6 - S6
  • [37] Nicotine deprivation and overt attentional orienting to smoking cues
    Field, MJ
    Mogg, K
    Bradley, BP
    BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 13 (5-6): : 483 - 484
  • [38] Alcohol increases cognitive biases for smoking cues in smokers
    Matt Field
    Karin Mogg
    Brendan P. Bradley
    Psychopharmacology, 2005, 180 : 63 - 72
  • [39] SMOKERS REACTIONS TO INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION AND PRESENTATION OF SMOKING CUES
    NIAURA, R
    ABRAMS, DB
    PEDRAZA, M
    MONTI, PM
    ROHSENOW, DJ
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1992, 17 (06) : 557 - 566
  • [40] Alcohol increases cognitive biases for smoking cues in smokers
    Field, M
    Mogg, K
    Bradley, BP
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 180 (01) : 63 - 72