A Critical Assessment of Industrial Coal Drying Technologies: Role of Energy, Emissions, Risk and Sustainability

被引:125
|
作者
Jangam, S. V.
Karthikeyan, M. [2 ]
Mujumdar, A. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn & Minerals, Met & Mat Technol Ctr M3TC, Blk EA, Singapore 117576, Singapore
[2] Surbana Int Consultants Pte Ltd, Jalan Bukit Merah, Singapore
关键词
Energy efficiency; Greenhouse gases; Innovation; LCA; Low-rank coal; Risk assessment; Selection of dryers; Sustainable; FLUIDIZED-BED; PART; PERFORMANCE; LIGNITE; DRYER; SIMULATION; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1080/07373937.2010.498070
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Low-rank coals (LRCs) constitute about 45% of the total coal reserves and hence will soon be the fossil fuel of choice in many countries despite their high moisture content on mining, which varies from 30% to as high as 66%. It is important to reduce their water content to enhance the heating value and reduce transportation costs while enhancing combustion efficiency, safety, and reduction of emissions on combustion. The level of moisture to be achieved upon drying LRCs depends on the end application; it varies from as low as 0% for hydrogenation processes to 15% for briquetting and gasification processes. Numerous drying technologies have been proposed for drying coal; they include pulse combustion, vacuum, fluid bed, rotary, flash, microwave, and superheated steam drying. Each technology has some pros and cons, which are not always clearly spelled out in the literature. In addition, it is necessary to develop sustainable rather than just cost-effective drying systems for LRC. In this article we assess various coal drying techniques critically and identify their strengths and weaknesses. Some theoretical comparisons of different dryer types are carried out based on energy utilization and carbon footprints. The jury is still out on optimal drying technology for LRC and innovative design concepts should be evaluated before finalizing the selection.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 407
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital Technologies and Sustainability Assessment: A Critical Review on the Integration Methods between BIM and LEED
    Cascone, Stefano
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [42] The role of the chemical sciences in 'decarbonizing' the conversion of energy and industrial and agricultural emissions
    Matlin, Stephen A.
    Rosei, Federico
    Lambin, Philippe
    Jin, Lei
    RSC SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 2 (12): : 3566 - 3569
  • [43] Assessment of the implications of energy-efficient technologies on the environmental sustainability of rail operation
    Sharma, Sanjeev
    Kandpal, Vinay
    Choudhury, Tanupriya
    Gonzalez, Ernesto D. R. Santibanez
    Agarwal, Naveen
    AIMS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 10 (05) : 709 - 731
  • [44] Sustainability assessment of alternative waste-to-energy technologies for the management of sewage sludge
    Ronda, Alicia
    Haro, Pedro
    Gomez-Barea, Alberto
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 159 : 52 - 62
  • [45] Sustainability Assessment of Energy Storage Technologies Based on Commercialization Viability: MCDM Model
    Shu, Xiaoyang
    Kumar, Raman
    Saha, Rajeev Kumar
    Dev, Nikhil
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Sharma, Shubham
    Rafighi, Mohammad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [46] Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies
    Assefa, G.
    Frostell, B.
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2007, 29 (01) : 63 - 78
  • [47] Global supply sustainability assessment of critical metals for clean energy technology
    Han, Sun
    Meng, Zhenghao
    Li, Meilin
    Yang, Xiaohui
    Wang, Xiaoxue
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
  • [48] Sustainability assessment of energy production: A critical review of methods, measures and issues
    Turkson, Charles
    Acquaye, Adolf
    Liu, Wenbin
    Papadopoulos, Thanos
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 264
  • [49] The role of Industry 4.0 technologies in driving the financial importance of sustainability risk management
    Turek, Jolanta
    Ocicka, Barbara
    Rogowski, Waldemar
    Jefmanski, Bartlomiej
    EQUILIBRIUM-QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY, 2023, 18 (04): : 1009 - 1044
  • [50] The potential for energy-efficient technologies to reduce carbon emissions in the United States: Industrial sector
    Boyd, GA
    Roop, JM
    Woodruff, MG
    IECEC-97 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SECOND INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4: VOL.1: AEROSPACE POWER SYSTEMS AND TECHNOL; VOL 2: ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOL, CONVERSION TECHNOL, THERMAL MANAGEMENT; VOLS 3: ENERGY SYSTEMS, RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, POLICY IMPACTS ON ENERGY; VOL 4: POST DEADLINE PAPERS, INDEX, 1997, : 2126 - 2131