When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness

被引:44
|
作者
Verboon, Peter [1 ]
van Dijke, Marius [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Dept Psychol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Sanction severity; Procedural fairness; Compliance; Moral evaluations; TAX EVASION; TRUST; DETERRENCE; JUSTICE; SYSTEMS; SELF; PUNISHMENTS; PSYCHOLOGY; LEGITIMACY; MEDIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Building on theoretical notions that severe sanctions (more than mild ones) can communicate that sanctioned behavior is morally unacceptable, we argued that particularly authorities who enact the sanction procedures in a fair manner stimulate compliance with their decisions. This is because such authorities should be considered legitimate to communicate what is morally acceptable and unacceptable. This interactive effect of sanction size and procedural fairness on compliance should thus be mediated by moral evaluations of the authority. A field survey and an experiment revealed support for these predictions. These results thus support a non-instrumental perspective on the effectiveness of sanction severity in increasing compliance with authorities. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 130
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementing targeted sanctions in Australia: A role for procedural fairness
    Tully, Stephen
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2010, 18 (01):
  • [2] When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority
    van den Bos, K
    Wilke, HAM
    Lind, EA
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (06) : 1449 - 1458
  • [3] Procedural Fairness and Tax Compliance
    Hartner, Martina
    Rechberger, Silvia
    Kirchler, Erich
    Schabmann, Alfred
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2008, 38 (01) : 137 - 152
  • [4] Organizing consent: The role of procedural fairness in political trust and compliance
    Grimes, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 45 (02) : 285 - 315
  • [5] When Do the Ends Justify the Means? Evaluating Procedural Fairness
    Doherty, David
    Wolak, Jennifer
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2012, 34 (02) : 301 - 323
  • [6] When Do the Ends Justify the Means? Evaluating Procedural Fairness
    David Doherty
    Jennifer Wolak
    Political Behavior, 2012, 34 : 301 - 323
  • [7] Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it
    Brockner, J
    Chen, YR
    Mannix, EA
    Leung, K
    Skarlicki, DP
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (01) : 138 - 159
  • [8] Twice Punished: Perceived Procedural Fairness and Legitimacy of Monetary Sanctions
    Pleggenkuhle, Breanne
    Kras, Kimberly R.
    Huebner, Beth M.
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2021, 37 (01) : 88 - 107
  • [9] When Do Procedural Fairness and Outcome Fairness Interact to Influence Legitimacy of Authorities? The Moderating Effect of Social Class
    Yang, Linchuan
    Ma, Hongyu
    Jiang, Hai
    Jiang, Juan
    Qi, Ling
    Hu, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 1071 - 1071
  • [10] When Do Procedural Fairness and Outcome Fairness Interact to Influence Employees' Work Attitudes and Behaviors? The Moderating Effect of Uncertainty
    De Cremer, David
    Brockner, Joel
    Fishman, Ariel
    van Dijke, Marius
    van Olffen, Woody
    Mayer, David M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (02) : 291 - 304