Effect of Correlations in Swarms on Collective Response

被引:26
|
作者
Mateo, David [1 ]
Kuan, Yoke Kong [1 ]
Bouffanais, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Univ Technol & Design, 8 Somapah Rd, Singapore 487372, Singapore
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2017年 / 7卷
关键词
SCALE-FREE CORRELATIONS; THRESHOLD MODELS; NETWORKS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-09830-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social interaction increases significantly the performance of a wide range of cooperative systems. However, evidence that natural swarms limit the number of interactions suggests potentially detrimental consequences of excessive interaction. Using a canonical model of collective motion, we find that the collective response to a dynamic localized perturbation-emulating a predator attack-is hindered when the number of interacting neighbors exceeds a certain threshold. Specifically, the effectiveness in avoiding the predator is enhanced by large integrated correlations, which are known to peak at a given level of interagent interaction. From the network-theoretic perspective, we uncover the same interplay between number of connections and effectiveness in group-level response for two distinct decision-making models of distributed consensus operating over a range of static networks. The effect of the number of connections on the collective response critically depends on the dynamics of the perturbation. While adding more connections improves the response to slow perturbations, the opposite is true for fast ones. These results have far-reaching implications for the design of artificial swarms or interaction networks.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Collective behavior analysis of a class of social foraging swarms
    Liu, B
    Chu, TG
    Wang, L
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICAL LIFE, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3630 : 584 - 593
  • [32] On the mathematical theory of behavioral swarms emerging collective dynamics
    Bellomo, N.
    Ha, S. -y.
    Outada, N.
    Yoon, J.
    MATHEMATICAL MODELS & METHODS IN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 32 (14): : 2927 - 2959
  • [33] Wave algorithm applied to collective navigation of robotic swarms
    Silva Junior, Luneque
    Nedjah, Nadia
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 57 : 698 - 707
  • [34] Federated Reinforcement Learning for Collective Navigation of Robotic Swarms
    Na, Seongin
    Roucek, Tomas
    Ulrich, Jiri
    Pikman, Jan
    Krajnik, Tomas
    Lennox, Barry
    Arvin, Farshad
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COGNITIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 15 (04) : 2122 - 2131
  • [35] Dynamical Renormalization Group Approach to the Collective Behavior of Swarms
    Cavagna, Andrea
    Di Carlo, Luca
    Giardina, Irene
    Grandinetti, Luca
    Grigera, Tomas S.
    Pisegna, Giulia
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2019, 123 (26)
  • [36] Emergence of Specialised Collective Behaviors in Evolving Heterogeneous Swarms
    van Diggelen, Fuda
    de Carlo, Matteo
    Cambier, Nicolas
    Ferrante, Eliseo
    Eiben, Guszti
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE-PPSN XVIII, PT II, PPSN 2024, 2024, 15149 : 53 - 69
  • [37] Collective Information Processing and Pattern Formation in Swarms, Flocks, and Crowds
    Moussaid, Mehdi
    Garnier, Simon
    Theraulaz, Guy
    Helbing, Dirk
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2009, 1 (03) : 469 - 497
  • [38] Enhanced Foraging in Robot Swarms Using Collective Levy Walks
    Nauta, Johannes
    van Havermaet, Stef
    Simoens, Pieter
    Khaluf, Yara
    ECAI 2020: 24TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 325 : 171 - 178
  • [39] Congestion and Scalability in Robot Swarms: A Study on Collective Decision Making
    Soma, Karthik
    Vardharajan, Vivek Shankar
    Hamann, Heiko
    Beltrame, Giovanni
    2023 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MULTI-ROBOT AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, MRS, 2023, : 199 - 206
  • [40] Potential of Heterogeneity in Collective Behaviors: A Case Study on Heterogeneous Swarms
    Kengyel, Daniela
    Hamann, Heiko
    Zahadat, Payam
    Radspieler, Gerald
    Wotawa, Franz
    Schmickl, Thomas
    PRIMA 2015: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2015, 9387 : 201 - 217