Can machine learning predict drug nanocrystals?

被引:60
|
作者
He, Yuan [1 ]
Ye, Zhuyifan [1 ]
Liu, Xinyang [1 ]
Wei, Zhengjie [1 ]
Qiu, Fen [1 ]
Li, Hai-Feng [2 ]
Zheng, Ying [1 ]
Ouyang, Defang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Inst Chinese Med Sci ICMS, State Key Lab Qual Res Chinese Med, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Macau, Inst Appl Phys & Mat Engn, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Nanocrystals; Particle size; Polydispersity index (PDI); Prediction; POORLY SOLUBLE DRUGS; FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT; NANOSUSPENSIONS; TECHNOLOGY; SOLUBILITY; DELIVERY; BIOAVAILABILITY; DISCOVERY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.043
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Nanocrystals have exhibited great advantage for enhancing the dissolution rate of water insoluble drugs due to the reduced size to nanoscale. However, current pharmaceutical approaches for nanocrystals formulation development highly depend on the expert experience and trial-and-error attempts which remain time and resource consuming. In this research, we utilized machine learning techniques to predict the particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanocrystals. Firstly, 910 nanocrystal size data and 341 PDI data by three preparation methods (ball wet milling (BWM) method, high-pressure homogenization (HPH) method and antisolvent precipitation (ASP) method) were collected for the construction of the prediction models. The results demonstrated that light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) exhibited well performance for the nanocrystals size and PDI prediction with BWM and HPH methods, but relatively poor predictions for ASP method. The possible reasons for the poor prediction refer to low quality of data because of the poor reproducibility and instability of nanocrystals by ASP method, which also confirm that current commercialized products were mainly manufactured by BWM and HPH approaches. Notably, the contribution of the influence factors was ranked by the LightGBM, which demonstrated that milling time, cycle index and concentration of stabilizer are crucial factors for nanocrystals prepared by BWM, HPH and ASP, respectively. Furthermore, the model generalizations and prediction accuracies of LightGBM were confirmed experimentally by the newly prepared nanocrystals. In conclusion, the machine learning techniques can be successfully utilized for the predictions of nanocrystals prepared by BWM and HPH methods. Our research also reveals a new way for nanotechnology manufacture.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 285
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE: HOW LAWYERS CAN (MAYBE) PREDICT JUDGMENTS WITH MACHINE LEARNING
    Cardaci, Nicholas
    UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW, 2023, 50 (01): : 51 - 93
  • [42] Can the MMPI Predict Adult ADHD? An Approach Using Machine Learning Methods
    Kim, Sunhae
    Lee, Hye-Kyung
    Lee, Kounseok
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (06)
  • [43] Small Earthquakes Can Help Predict Large Earthquakes: A Machine Learning Perspective
    Wang, Xi
    Zhong, Zeyuan
    Yao, Yuechen
    Li, Zexu
    Zhou, Shiyong
    Jiang, Changsheng
    Jia, Ke
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [44] Machine learning can predict a scientist's gender from citation data
    Allen, Michael
    PHYSICS WORLD, 2022, 35 (11) : 10 - +
  • [45] Machine learning algorithms can predict emotional valence across ungulate vocalizations
    Lefevre, Romain A.
    Sypherd, Ciara C. R.
    Briefer, Elodie F.
    ISCIENCE, 2025, 28 (02)
  • [46] Can Machine Learning Technique Predict the Prostate Cancer accurately?: The fact and remedy
    Hasan, Sm Mahamudul
    Rabbi, Md Forhad
    Jahan, Nusrat
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2021 (ICECIT 2021), 2021,
  • [47] Machine learning can predict lung cancer using primary care data
    Ananth, Sachin
    Navarra, Alessio
    Mogal, Rahul
    Vancheeswaran, Rama
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 165 : S23 - S23
  • [48] Machine learning can predict mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease
    Amboni, Marianna
    Ricciardi, Carlo
    Adamo, Sarah
    Nicolai, Emanuele
    Volzone, Antonio
    Erro, Roberto
    Cuoco, Sofia
    Cesarelli, Giuseppe
    Basso, Luca
    D'Addio, Giovanni
    Salvatore, Marco
    Pace, Leonardo
    Barone, Paolo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [49] Can Twitter Attention Predict Citation Metrics? A Machine Learning Aided Analysis
    Lumley, Emma
    Perin, Giordano
    Baker, Megan
    Hanton, Alice
    Mahendran, Ashuvini
    Saha, Arin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [50] Can we predict T cell specificity with digital biology and machine learning?
    Hudson, Dan
    Fernandes, Ricardo A. A.
    Basham, Mark
    Ogg, Graham
    Koohy, Hashem
    NATURE REVIEWS IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 23 (08) : 511 - 521