Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Martinic, Marina Krnic [1 ]
Malisa, Snjezana [2 ]
Aranza, Diana [3 ]
Civljak, Marta [2 ]
Marusic, Ana [4 ]
Sapunar, Damir [5 ]
Pericic, Tina Poklepovic [4 ]
Buljan, Ivan [4 ]
Tokalic, Ruzica [4 ]
Cavic, Dalibor [2 ]
Puljak, Livia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Split, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Split, Croatia
[2] Catholic Univ Croatia, Ctr Evidence Based Med & Hlth Care, Ilica 242, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[3] Univ Split, Univ Dept Hlth Studies, Split, Croatia
[4] Univ Split, Dept Res Biomed & Hlth, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[5] Univ Split, Dept Histol & Embryol, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-022-03763-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Lack of knowledge about systematic reviews (SRs) could prevent individual healthcare workers (HCWs) from using SRs as a source of information in their clinical practice or discourage them from participating in such research. In this study, we aimed to explore in-depth the opinion of a sample of HCWs about the newly created online educational intervention designed to improve knowledge about SRs. Methods We created a brief online educational intervention on SRs, consisting of 11 textual modules. We evaluated it among practicing HCWs who graduated from a university-level health sciences program using a mixed-methods pilot study that consisted of pre- and post-intervention questionnaires and qualitative evaluation via semi-structured interviews. We assessed participants' knowledge about SR methodology before and after the intervention, and compared the responses. We sought their opinions about the characteristics of SRs. Also, the participants were presented with four scientific abstracts, where they were asked to distinguish whether those abstracts presented summaries of a systematic or a non-systematic review. Results Twelve participants took part in the study. In the pilot study, the participants' knowledge about SRs was improved after the intervention compared to the baseline. Participants provided positive feedback regarding the educational intervention. Suggestions to improve the educational intervention were to provide more details about the forest plot, add more digital content or images, provide more details about the methodological steps of an SR, add descriptions about practical applications of SRs and provide links to additional educational materials. The participants suggested that HCWs could be motivated to take part in such an education if it is offered as continuing medical education (CME) course or credit for academic/career advancement. Conclusion HCWs provided positive feedback about the newly designed online educational intervention on SRs; they considered it an appropriate tool for learning about SRs and resulted in increased knowledge about SRs. In addition, participants gave suggestions for improving education, which can be used to tailor the education for end-users. In future studies, it would be useful to examine the effectiveness of the modified educational intervention on increasing knowledge in a larger sample and in the form of a randomized controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Supporting Community Health Workers After a Disaster: Findings From a Mixed-Methods Pilot Evaluation Study of a Psychoeducational Intervention
    Powell, Tara
    Yuma-Guerrero, Paula
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2016, 10 (05) : 754 - 761
  • [22] Office workers' experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
    Dewitt, Stephen
    Hall, Jennifer
    Smith, Lee
    Buckley, John P.
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    Mansfield, Louise
    Gardner, Benjamin
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [23] Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
    Stephen Dewitt
    Jennifer Hall
    Lee Smith
    John P. Buckley
    Stuart J. H. Biddle
    Louise Mansfield
    Benjamin Gardner
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [24] The RESCUE Problem Solving Intervention for Stroke Caregivers: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study
    Jordan, Meggan M.
    Freytes, Ivette M.
    Orozco, Tatiana
    Tuan, Alyssa W.
    Dang, Stuti
    Rutter, Tabitha
    Uphold, Constance R.
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 67 (04) : 484 - 496
  • [25] An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study
    Allan, Louise M.
    Wheatley, Alison
    Smith, Amy
    Flynn, Elizabeth
    Homer, Tara
    Robalino, Shannon
    Beyer, Fiona R.
    Foxo, Christopher
    Howel, Denise
    Barber, Robert
    Connolly, Jim Anthony
    Robinson, Louise
    Parry, Steve Wayne
    Rochester, Lynn
    Corner, Lynne
    Bamford, Claire
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 23 (59) : 1 - +
  • [26] A multi-professional educational intervention to improve and sustain respondents' confidence to deliver palliative care: A mixed-methods study
    Reed, Elizabeth
    Todd, Jennifer
    Lawton, Sally
    Grant, Robert
    Sadler, Clair
    Berg, Jane
    Lucas, Caroline
    Watson, Max
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (02) : 571 - 580
  • [27] Acculturative stress and coping among migrant workers: A global mixed-methods systematic review
    Liem, Andrian
    Renzaho, Andre M. N.
    Hannam, Kevin
    Lam, Agnes I. F.
    Hall, Brian J.
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2021, 13 (03) : 491 - 517
  • [28] Knowledge of and access to frontline workers among poor, rural households in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study
    Quinones, Sarah
    Palermo, Tia
    Gavrilovic, Maja
    Vinci, Vincenzo
    Otchere, Frank
    Mussa, Essa Chanie
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [29] Knowledge of and access to frontline workers among poor, rural households in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study
    Sarah Quinones
    Tia Palermo
    Maja Gavrilovic
    Vincenzo Vinci
    Frank Otchere
    Essa Chanie Mussa
    BMC Public Health, 22
  • [30] Feasibility of a self-management intervention to improve mobility in the community after stroke (SIMS): A mixed-methods pilot study
    Sahely, Ahmad
    Sintler, Carron
    Soundy, Andrew
    Rosewilliam, Sheeba
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):