Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Martinic, Marina Krnic [1 ]
Malisa, Snjezana [2 ]
Aranza, Diana [3 ]
Civljak, Marta [2 ]
Marusic, Ana [4 ]
Sapunar, Damir [5 ]
Pericic, Tina Poklepovic [4 ]
Buljan, Ivan [4 ]
Tokalic, Ruzica [4 ]
Cavic, Dalibor [2 ]
Puljak, Livia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Split, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Split, Croatia
[2] Catholic Univ Croatia, Ctr Evidence Based Med & Hlth Care, Ilica 242, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[3] Univ Split, Univ Dept Hlth Studies, Split, Croatia
[4] Univ Split, Dept Res Biomed & Hlth, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[5] Univ Split, Dept Histol & Embryol, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-022-03763-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Lack of knowledge about systematic reviews (SRs) could prevent individual healthcare workers (HCWs) from using SRs as a source of information in their clinical practice or discourage them from participating in such research. In this study, we aimed to explore in-depth the opinion of a sample of HCWs about the newly created online educational intervention designed to improve knowledge about SRs. Methods We created a brief online educational intervention on SRs, consisting of 11 textual modules. We evaluated it among practicing HCWs who graduated from a university-level health sciences program using a mixed-methods pilot study that consisted of pre- and post-intervention questionnaires and qualitative evaluation via semi-structured interviews. We assessed participants' knowledge about SR methodology before and after the intervention, and compared the responses. We sought their opinions about the characteristics of SRs. Also, the participants were presented with four scientific abstracts, where they were asked to distinguish whether those abstracts presented summaries of a systematic or a non-systematic review. Results Twelve participants took part in the study. In the pilot study, the participants' knowledge about SRs was improved after the intervention compared to the baseline. Participants provided positive feedback regarding the educational intervention. Suggestions to improve the educational intervention were to provide more details about the forest plot, add more digital content or images, provide more details about the methodological steps of an SR, add descriptions about practical applications of SRs and provide links to additional educational materials. The participants suggested that HCWs could be motivated to take part in such an education if it is offered as continuing medical education (CME) course or credit for academic/career advancement. Conclusion HCWs provided positive feedback about the newly designed online educational intervention on SRs; they considered it an appropriate tool for learning about SRs and resulted in increased knowledge about SRs. In addition, participants gave suggestions for improving education, which can be used to tailor the education for end-users. In future studies, it would be useful to examine the effectiveness of the modified educational intervention on increasing knowledge in a larger sample and in the form of a randomized controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study
    Marina Krnic Martinic
    Snjezana Malisa
    Diana Aranza
    Marta Civljak
    Ana Marušić
    Damir Sapunar
    Tina Poklepovic Pericic
    Ivan Buljan
    Ruzica Tokalic
    Dalibor Cavic
    Livia Puljak
    BMC Medical Education, 22
  • [2] Developing Medication Reviews to Improve the Aruban Healthcare System: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study
    Copinga, Minke L.
    Kok, Ellen A.
    van Dam, Anke J. J.
    Wever, Anoeska
    Tromp, Adrienne
    Woerdenbag, Herman J.
    PHARMACY, 2024, 12 (04)
  • [3] A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study of a Well-Being Intervention for Healthcare Chaplains
    Harris, Stephanie L.
    Sawyer, Amanda T.
    Tao, Hong
    Bailey, Amanda K.
    JOURNAL OF PASTORAL CARE & COUNSELING, 2023, 77 (02) : 101 - 112
  • [4] A listening skill educational intervention for pediatric rehabilitation clinicians: A mixed-methods pilot study
    King, Gillian
    Servais, Michelle
    Shepherd, Tracy A.
    Willoughby, Colleen
    Bolack, Linda
    Moodie, Sheila
    Baldwin, Patricia
    Strachan, Deborah
    Knickle, Kerry
    Pinto, Madhu
    Parker, Kathryn
    McNaughton, Nancy
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2017, 20 (01) : 40 - 52
  • [5] Long COVID in healthcare workers: longitudinal mixed-methods study
    Grant, A.
    Adams, N. N.
    Maciver, E.
    Skatun, D.
    Scott, N.
    Kennedy, C.
    Douglas, F.
    Hernandez-Santiago, V
    Torrance, N.
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2024,
  • [6] Complementary and Alternative Medicine Online Learning Intervention for Oncology Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Baydoun, Mohamad
    Levin, Gregory
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    Oberoi, Devesh
    Sidhu, Aven
    Carlson, Linda E.
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2022, 21
  • [7] Complementary and Alternative Medicine Online Learning Intervention for Oncology Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Baydoun, Mohamad
    Levin, Gregory
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    Oberoi, Devesh
    Sidhu, Aven
    Carlson, Linda E.
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2022, 21
  • [8] Digital Competence among Healthcare Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Laakkonen, Noora
    Jarva, Erika
    Hammaren, Mira
    Kanste, Outi
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Oikarinen, Anne
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 2024
  • [9] Compassion training for healthcare professionals in oncology: A mixed-methods pilot study
    Witte, Henriette
    Svenningsen, Lone
    Gronkjaer, Lea Ladegaard
    Donskov, Frede
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2025, 75
  • [10] Mixed-methods study to assess an intervention for healthier lifestyles in primary healthcare
    Katanolli, A. Bytyci
    Merten, S.
    Kwiatkowski, M.
    Obas, K.
    Gerold, J.
    Zahorka, M.
    Jerliu, N.
    Ramadani, Q.
    Fota, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32