An 8-Year Experience of Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (AlloDerm)

被引:281
|
作者
Salzberg, C. Andrew [1 ]
Ashikari, Andrew Y. [1 ]
Koch, R. Michael [1 ]
Chabner-Thompson, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Med Coll, Div Plast Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
SKIN-SPARING MASTECTOMY; LONG-TERM; EXPANDER/IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TISSUE MATRIX; COMPLICATIONS; ALLOGRAFT; RADIATION; COVERAGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The advent of skin-and nipple-sparing mastectomy in conjunction with the use of human acellular dermal matrix to provide lower pole coverage has made direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy feasible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term complications associated with this technique. Methods: All human acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant immediate reconstructions performed over an 8-year period were included in this analysis. Patient charts were reviewed for type of mastectomy (oncologic or prophylactic), incision type, complications during follow-up, length of follow-up, rate and type of revision surgery in breasts without postoperative complications, contralateral procedures, and adjuvant radiotherapy. Results: A total of 466 breasts (260 patients) were reconstructed; 68 percent were prophylactic and 32 percent were oncologic cases. Twenty-one breasts (4.5 percent) received radiotherapy. Mean implant size placed was 412.8 +/- 24.7 cc (range, 150 to 600 cc). Mean follow-up was 28.9 +/- 21.3 months (range, 0.3 to 97.7 months). The overall complication rate was 3.9 percent (implant loss, 1.3 percent; skin breakdown/necrosis, 1.1 percent; hematoma, 1.1 percent; human acellular dermal matrix exposure, 0.6 percent; capsular contracture, 0.4 percent; and infection, 0.2 percent). Type, incidence, and overall rate of complications did not differ significantly between prophylactic and oncologic breasts. Irradiated breasts had a fourfold higher rate of complications. In 354 breasts with more than 1 year of follow-up (mean, 36.7 +/- 18.6 months; range, 12.1 to 97.7 months), there were no long-term complications. Conclusions: Human acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction following mastectomy is safe and reliable, with a low overall long-term complication rate. The low incidence of capsular contracture supports the growing body of evidence that human acellular dermal matrix mitigates capsular contracture. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 127: 514, 2011.)
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 524
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction
    Krishnan, Naveen M.
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Rosenkranz, Kari M.
    Powell, Stephen G.
    Nigriny, John F.
    Vidal, Dale C.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (04): : 468 - 476
  • [32] Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Vardanian, Andrew J.
    Clayton, John L.
    Roostaeian, Jason
    Shirvanian, Vaheh
    Da Lio, Andrew
    Lipa, Joan E.
    Crisera, Christopher
    Festekjian, Jaco H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (05) : 403E - 410E
  • [33] Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Scheflan, Michael
    Allweis, Tanir M.
    Ben Yehuda, Dafna
    Lotan, Adi Maisel
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (11) : E3265
  • [34] Direct to implant breast reconstruction without the use of an acellular-dermal matrix
    Serrurier, L. C.
    Benn, C.
    Rayne, S.
    BREAST, 2015, 24 : S135 - S135
  • [35] Evaluation of post-operative complications and adjuvant treatments following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix
    Bassi, Romane
    Jankowski, Clementine
    Dabajuyo, Sandrine
    Burnier, Pierre
    Coutant, Charles
    Vincent, Laura
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 95 : 402 - 410
  • [36] Breast reconstruction using implant and acellular dermal matrix: "The trapezoidal technique"
    Veneroso, A.
    Gianquinto, D.
    Trapasso, M.
    Falco, E.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (11): : E332 - E333
  • [37] Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Urban, Cicero
    Gonzalez, Eduardo
    Fornazari, Alessandra
    Berman, Gaston
    Spautz, Cleverton
    Kuroda, Flavia
    Anselmi, Karina Furlan
    Rabinovich, Iris
    Doria, Maira
    Nissen, Leonardo
    Schunemann, Eduardo, Jr.
    Sobreiro, Bernardo
    Lima, Rubens
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (05) : 973 - 983
  • [38] Technical results and complication rates after nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix for implant coverage
    Reitsamer, Roland
    Peintinger, Florentia
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [39] Complications after Perforated versus Nonperforated Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis
    Wood, Kasey Leigh
    Margulies, Ilana G.
    Shay, Paul L.
    Ashikari, Andrew Y.
    Salzberg, C. Andrew
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (03) : e2690
  • [40] Outcome of complete acellular dermal matrix wrap with polyurethane implant in immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction
    Naemonitou, Foteini
    Mylvaganam, Senthurun
    Salem, Fathi
    Vidya, Raghavan
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2020, 47 (06): : 567 - 573