An Improved Ship Collision Risk Evaluation Method for Korea Maritime Safety Audit Considering Traffic Flow Characteristics

被引:14
|
作者
Yoo, Yunja [1 ]
Kim, Tae-Goun [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Maritime Inst, Maritime Safety Dept, Busan 49111, South Korea
[2] Korea Maritime & Ocean Univ, Div Maritime Transportat Sci, Busan 49112, South Korea
关键词
ship collision risk; geometric collision probability; distribution characteristics; gate line; ship collision frequency; NAVIGATIONAL SAFETY; COMPUTER-SIMULATION; DOMAIN; CRITERION;
D O I
10.3390/jmse7120448
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Ship collision accidents account for the majority of marine accidents. The collision risk can be even greater in ports where the traffic density is high and terrain conditions are difficult. The proximity assessment model of the Korea Maritime Safety Audit (KMSA), which is a tool for improving maritime traffic safety, employs a normal distribution of ship traffic to calculate the ship collision risk. However, ship traffic characteristics can differ according to the characteristics of the sea area and shipping route. Therefore, this study simulates collision probabilities by estimating the best-fit distribution function of ship traffic flow in Ulsan Port, which is the largest hazardous cargo vessel handling port in Korea. A comparison of collision probability simulation results using the best-fit function and the normal distribution function reveals a difference of approximately 1.5-2.4 times for each route. Moreover, the collision probability estimates are not accurate when the normal distribution function is uniformly applied without considering the characteristics of each route. These findings can be used to improve the KMSA evaluation method for ship collision risks, particularly in hazardous port areas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transfer learning-based highway crash risk evaluation considering manifold characteristics of traffic flow
    Liu, Qingchao
    Li, Chun
    Jiang, Haobin
    Nie, Shiqi
    Chen, Long
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 168
  • [22] Transfer learning-based highway crash risk evaluation considering manifold characteristics of traffic flow
    Liu, Qingchao
    Li, Chun
    Jiang, Haobin
    Nie, Shiqi
    Chen, Long
    Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2022, 168
  • [23] AN APPLICATION OF AGENT-BASED TRAFFIC FLOW MODEL FOR MARITIME SAFETY MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
    Masalaci, B. Celik
    Zorba, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2023, 165 (01): : A55 - A70
  • [24] Traffic safety evaluation of mixed traffic flow considering the maximum platoon size of connected automated vehicles
    Jiang, Yangsheng
    Ren, Tingting
    Ma, Yuqin
    Wu, Yunxia
    Yao, Zhihong
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2023, 612
  • [25] Improved FMEA method for risk evaluation considering expert consensus
    Wang R.
    Li Y.-L.
    Zhu J.-H.
    Yang Y.
    Li, Yan-Lai (yanlaili@home.swjtu.edu.cn), 2018, Zhejiang University (52): : 1058 - 1067
  • [26] Traffic safety evaluation of emerging mixed traffic flow at freeway merging area considering driving behavior
    He, Yaqin
    Xiang, Dingshan
    Wang, Daobin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [27] Inatorial forecasting method considering macro and micro characteristics of chaotic traffic flow
    侯越
    张迪
    李达
    杨萍
    Chinese Physics B, 2023, 32 (10) : 404 - 416
  • [28] Inatorial forecasting method considering macro and micro characteristics of chaotic traffic flow
    Hou, Yue
    Zhang, Di
    Li, Da
    Yang, Ping
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2023, 32 (10)
  • [29] Improved prediction method of network traffic flow based on chaos characteristics
    School of Automation, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
    不详
    Binggong Xuebao, 2007, 11 (1346-1350):
  • [30] Towards real-time ship collision risk analysis: An improved R-TCR model considering target ship motion uncertainty
    Li, Mengxia
    Mou, Junmin
    Chen, Pengfei
    Rong, Hao
    Chen, Linying
    Gelder, P. H. A. J. M. Van
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 226