Prioritizing Construction Labor Productivity Improvement Strategies Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

被引:7
|
作者
Kazerooni, Matin [1 ]
Phuong Nguyen [1 ]
Fayek, Aminah Robinson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Hole Sch Construct Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
construction labor productivity; fuzzy multi-criteria decision making; fuzzy cognitive map; productivity improvement strategy; impact quantification; AHP; SELECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/a14090254
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Construction labor productivity (CLP) is affected by various interconnected factors, such as crew motivation and working conditions. Improved CLP can benefit a construction project in many ways, such as a shortened project life cycle and lowering project cost. However, budget, time, and resource restrictions force companies to select and implement only a limited number of CLP improvement strategies. Therefore, a research gap exists regarding methods for supporting the selection of CLP improvement strategies for a given project by quantifying the impact of strategies on CLP with respect to interrelationships among CLP factors. This paper proposes a decision support model that integrates fuzzy multi-criteria decision making with fuzzy cognitive maps to prioritize CLP improvement strategies based on their impact on CLP, causal relationships among CLP factors, and project characteristics. The proposed model was applied to determine CLP improvement strategies for concrete-pouring activities in building projects as an illustrative example. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a systematic approach for selecting appropriate CLP improvement strategies based on interrelationships among the factors affecting CLP and the impact of such strategies on CLP. The results are expected to support construction practitioners with identifying effective improvement strategies to enhance CLP in their projects.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE
    Liao, Huchang
    Xu, Zeshui
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2014, 27 (04) : 1703 - 1717
  • [22] Prioritizing desalination strategies using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Afify, Assem
    DESALINATION, 2010, 250 (03) : 928 - 935
  • [23] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach Using the Fuzzy Measures for Environmental Improvement under Neutrosophic Environment
    Li, Gang
    Niu, Chonghuai
    Zhang, Chao
    EKOLOJI, 2019, 28 (107): : 1605 - 1615
  • [24] FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL FOR SUBCONTRACTOR SELECTION IN INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
    Ulubeyli, Serdar
    Kazaz, Aynur
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2016, 22 (02) : 210 - 234
  • [25] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING OF CONSTRUCTION METHODS USING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS BASED ON FUZZY SCALES
    Thewes, M.
    Kamarianakis, S.
    ADVANCES IN UNDERGROUND SPACE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, : 1058 - 1072
  • [26] INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
    Perez-Dominguez, L.
    Alvarado-Iniesta, A.
    Garcia-Alcaraz, J. L.
    Valles-Rosales, D. J.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 15 (06): : 17 - 40
  • [27] Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making
    Zhu, B.
    Xu, Z. S.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2013, 64 (12) : 1831 - 1840
  • [28] Multi-criteria decision making using Fuzzy Logic and ATOVIC with application to manufacturing
    Yusuf, Hesham
    Panoutsos, George
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2020,
  • [29] Multi-criteria Decision Making Problem Using Trapezoidal Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets
    Ercan-Teksen, Hatice
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 3, INFUS 2024, 2024, 1090 : 644 - 650
  • [30] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier rating
    Lee, Hsuan-Shih
    2005 ICSC Congress on Computational Intelligence Methods and Applications (CIMA 2005), 2005, : 282 - 287