Modification of crop management and its influence on the structure of yield and quality of spring barley grain

被引:4
|
作者
Koutná, K [1 ]
Cerkal, R [1 ]
Zimolka, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Mendel Univ Brno, Zemedelska 1, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
关键词
spring barley; beet tops; yield; yield structure; grain quality; N fertilization; sowing rate;
D O I
10.17221/4157-PSE
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In 1998-2000, in a multi-factorial field experiment established by the method of split blocks and subplots, we studied the effect of three systems of beet tops management, two sowing rates and two levels of N fertilization and the effect of interactions of the factors on production and qualitative indicators of spring barley varieties Amulet and Kompakt. The evaluation shows the dominant effect of the particular year on the variability of all characters. The proportion of the effect of the year on the variability of characters ranged from 2.1 (number of plants per m(2)) to 80.1% (yield). The variability of quality parameters was also considerably affected by the genetic factor of the variety (grain over 2.5 mm sieve 40.4%, TGW 20.5%). The level of characters was greatly variable in relation to the course of climatic conditions of the year. The highest grain yield was achieved in 1999 (7.21 t/ha), the lowest one in 2000 (5.25 t/ha). The best quality parameters were shown by grain from the 1998 harvest (yield 6.20 t/ha) with significantly highest TGW (47.76 g), a high proportion of grain over 2.5 mm sieve (92.01%, 5.54 t/ha) and a favourable content of N substances in the grain (10.60%). Ploughed down beet tops supported the creation of the yield, the average differences between variants were, however, minimal being heavily affected by the course of weather in particular years. More favourable conditions for the creation of the yield (6.17 t/ha) and for the formation of mechanical properties of the spring barley grain (TGW 45.55 g, grain over 2.5 min sieve 85.86%) were produced by variants with late ploughing down beet tops, the smallest accumulation of N substances occurred in variants with harvested beet tops (11.83%). Sowing rate significantly affected values of all studied characters. Variants sown 4.5 MGS (6.27 t/ha) gave higher average grain yields, grain of better quality was obtained from the stands sown 3.5 MGS (TGW 45.22 g, grain over 2.5 sieve 84.41%, N substances 11.93%). Between particular varieties, significant differences were found both in the economic yield and the grain quality. The Kompakt variety showed on average 4.7% higher yield (6.37 t/ha) than the Amulet variety which, however, reached the higher average TGW values as well as the proportion of grain over 2.5 min sieve (45.87 g, 88.24%). The grain quality of the Amulet variety was negatively affected by the increased accumulation of N substances in the grain (12.49%). As compared with control, N fertilization at the rate of 30 kg/ha showed significant increase in the yield in 1998 only (by 7.5%) while in other years, an increase in the yield was not noticed. In all years under investigation, the TGW values and the proportion of grain over 2.5 mm sieve decreased and the content of N substances in grain increased after application of N at the rate of 30 kg/ha.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 465
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatial and Temporal Variability of Spring Barley Yield and Quality Quantified by Crop Simulation Model
    Cammarano, Davide
    Holland, Jonathan
    Ronga, Domenico
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [32] Yield and grain quality of spring barley as affected by biomass formation at early growth stages
    Kren, J.
    Klem, K.
    Svobodova, I.
    Misa, P.
    Neudert, L.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 60 (05) : 221 - 227
  • [33] GRAIN-FILLING DURATION AND YIELD IN SPRING BARLEY
    METZGER, DD
    CZAPLEWSKI, SJ
    RASMUSSON, DC
    CROP SCIENCE, 1984, 24 (06) : 1101 - 1105
  • [34] Grain quality and yield of spring barley in field trials under variable growing conditions
    Vanova, M.
    Palik, S.
    Hajslova, J.
    Buresova, I.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 52 (05) : 211 - 219
  • [35] Yield characters and their correlations with quality indicators of hull-less spring barley grain
    Ehrenbergerová, J
    Vaculová, K
    Zimolka, J
    Müllerová, E
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1999, 45 (02): : 53 - 59
  • [36] Role of sulphur in formation of spring barley grain yield, malting quality parameters, and PDMS
    Hrivna, Ludek
    Gregor, Tomas
    Sottnikova, Viera
    Cerkal, Radim
    Ryant, Pavel
    Prokes, Josef
    Radoch, Tomas
    Vavrousova, Petra
    KVASNY PRUMYSL, 2010, 56 (02): : 69 - 73
  • [37] THE CROP ROTATION INFLUENCE OF THE WEED INFESTATION AT THE SPRING BARLEY CROP
    Neischl, A.
    Zelena, V
    Winkler, J.
    MENDELNET 2010, 2010, : 104 - 110
  • [38] PLANT WATER RELATIONS, CROP GROWTH AND GRAIN-YIELD OF SPRING BARLEY IN RELATION TO TILLAGE METHODS
    SHARMA, RB
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1985, 6 (02): : 111 - 121
  • [39] Influence of Genotype, Environment, and Crop Management on the Yield and Bread-Making Quality in Spring Wheat Cultivars
    Ghafoor, Abu Zar
    Ceglinska, Alicja
    Karim, Hassan
    Wijata, Magdalena
    Sobczynski, Grzegorz
    Derejko, Adriana
    Studnicki, Marcin
    Rozbicki, Jan
    Cacak-Pietrzak, Grazyna
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [40] THE EFFICIENCY OF VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF GRAIN-YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN SPRING BARLEY ROWS
    ISMAIL, AB
    VALENTINE, J
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1983, 102 (03) : 539 - &