The use of grey-based methods in multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems: A review

被引：123

作者：

Elena Arce, Maria ^{[1
]}

Saavedra, Angeles ^{[2
]}

Miguez, Jose L. ^{[3
]}

Granada, Enrique ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Vigo, Spanish Naval Acad, Def Univ Ctr, Marin Pontevedra 36920, Spain

[2] Univ Vigo, ETS Ingn Minas, Vigo 36310, Spain

[3] Univ Vigo, ETS Ingenieros Ind, Vigo 36310, Spain

来源：

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2015年 / 47卷

关键词：

Sustainable energy; Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Grey-based analysis; Energy systems; MULTIPLE QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS; RELATIONAL ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DELPHI METHOD; MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION; GENERATION SECTOR; TAGUCHI METHOD; MAKING MODEL; FUZZY-AHP;

D O I：

10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.010

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The European energy system is characterized by a high dependence on fossil fuels and energy importation. Renewable energies are a solution to this issue. To change the energy supply, it is necessary to analyze the energy system. Thus, decision-makers face a multi-attribute decision problem. Many sustainable energy systems analyses are characterized by multiple, interrelated parameters and vague information. When the information is vague, it is necessary to implement multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools that can work with poor data systems. This article reviews appropriated methods and different stages of MCDA problems using grey relation methods (i.e., criteria selection and weighting methods). It is observed that technical criteria are the most evaluated parameters, followed by environmental criteria, in terms of gas emissions. In referring to criteria weighting, the analytical hierarchy process is the most popular tool, especially when it is essential to evaluate the opinion of an expert panel. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：924 / 932

页数：9

共 50 条

[21] Ranking renewable energy production methods based on economic and environmental criteria using multi-criteria decision analysis
Razi M.
Ali Y.
Environment Systems and Decisions, 2019, 39 (2) : 198 - 213
[22] Multi-criteria Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems
Radinja, Matej
Comas, Joaquim
Corominas, Lluis
Atanasova, Natasa
NEW TRENDS IN URBAN DRAINAGE MODELLING, UDM 2018, 2019, : 269 - 274
[23] Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Life Cycle Assessment Methods for Sustainable Evaluation of Concrete Mixtures
Moro, Carlos
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
[24] Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Mobile Triage Decision Systems
Haghighi, Pari Delir
Burstein, Frada
Churilov, Leonid
Patel, Akrati
DSS 2.0 - SUPPORTING DECISION MAKING WITH NEW TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 261 : 54 - +
[25] Sustainable Development Goals: A Regional Overview Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
D'Adamo, Idiano
Gastaldi, Massimo
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)
[26] An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues
Siksnelyte, Indre
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
Streimikiene, Dalia
Sharma, Deepak
ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (10)
[27] On the Similarities of Some Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods
Geldermann, Jutta
Schoebel, Anita
JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (3-4) : 219 - 230
[28] Metaheuristics and multi-criteria decision-making for renewable energy systems: Review, progress, bibliometric analysis, and contribution to the sustainable development pillars
Rezk, Hegazy
Olabi, Abdul Ghani
Mahmoud, Montaser
Wilberforce, Tabbi
Sayed, Enas Taha
AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (08)
[29] Prioritizing sustainable renewable energy systems in Tunisia: An integrated approach using hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis
Rekik, Sassi
El Alimi, Souheil
ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2024, 42 (03) : 1047 - 1076
[30] UNCERTAINTY AND PROBABILISTIC METHODS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
O Meachair, S.
Walsh, C.
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A579 - A579

← 1 2 3 4 5 →