The value of simulating herbivory in selecting effective weed biological control agents

被引:45
|
作者
Raghu, S [1 ]
Dhileepan, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Dept Nat Resources & Mines, Alan Fletcher Res Stn, CRC Australian Weed Management, Sherwood, Qld, Australia
关键词
agent selection; simulated herbivory; agent efficacy; ecological risk; tolerance; compensation; classical biological control;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.03.022
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Invasive species have a significant economic and ecological cost and biological control can be a powerful tool in their management. Classical biological control practice involves the re-establishment of trophic links between specialist insect and fungal agents to regulate populations of invasive species. However, the permanent nature of biological control agent introductions raises concerns about the unintended consequences of such introductions on non-target organisms, particularly when such agents are ineffective on their target organisms. In this paper, we explore the current debate in the selection of agents for weed classical biological control. We then propose an alternate approach, based on studying plant response to simulated herbivory, that could minimize the chances of release of ineffective agents. Simulating herbivory could yield insights into the vulnerability of plants to certain types of damage. Selection of agents within guilds that are likely to have a significant influence on the plant can improve the chances of achieving biological control sooner and reduce the likelihood of releasing ineffective agents that may have non-target impacts. We propose a method by which simulated herbivory could be integrated into the agent selection process and discuss its strengths and shortcomings. We present case studies of two Neotropical weeds illustrating how this method could be applied. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biological weed control symposium
    Bewick, TA
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 10 (03) : 599 - 599
  • [22] Selecting effective parasitoids for biological control introductions: Codling moth as a case study
    Mills, N
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2005, 34 (03) : 274 - 282
  • [23] Interactions among biological control agents on waterhyacinth: impacts of herbivory on the oviposition and development ofMegamelus scutellaris
    Goode, A. B. C.
    Knowles, B. K.
    Tipping, P. W.
    Foley, J. R.
    Gettys, L. A.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (11) : 1244 - 1249
  • [24] Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plants
    Sheppard, AW
    van Klinken, RD
    Heard, TA
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2005, 35 (03) : 215 - 226
  • [25] Soilborne microorganisms of Euphorbia are potential biological control agents of the invasive weed leafy spurge
    Kremer, RJ
    Caesar, AJ
    Souissi, T
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2006, 32 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [26] Predicting population dynamics of weed biological control agents: science or gazing into crystal balls?
    Zalucki, Myron P.
    van Klinken, Rieks D.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2006, 45 : 331 - 344
  • [27] Acute toxicity of mosquito pesticides on weed biological control agents in south Florida, USA
    Wheeler, Gregory S.
    Lake, Ellen C.
    Rayamajhi, Min B.
    Smith, Melissa C.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (08) : 855 - 861
  • [28] European ectoparasitoids of two classical weed biological control agents released in North America
    Muller, Franck J.
    Mason, Peter G.
    Dosdall, Lloyd M.
    Kuhlmann, Ulrich
    CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 2011, 143 (02): : 197 - 210
  • [29] Post-release genetic assessment of two congeneric weed biological control agents
    Keever, Carson C.
    Gultekin, Levent
    Bourchier, Robert S.
    Myers, Judith H.
    Cory, Jenny S.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2021, 152
  • [30] Grazing animals as weed control agents
    Popay, I
    Field, R
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 10 (01) : 217 - 231