The value of simulating herbivory in selecting effective weed biological control agents

被引:45
|
作者
Raghu, S [1 ]
Dhileepan, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Dept Nat Resources & Mines, Alan Fletcher Res Stn, CRC Australian Weed Management, Sherwood, Qld, Australia
关键词
agent selection; simulated herbivory; agent efficacy; ecological risk; tolerance; compensation; classical biological control;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.03.022
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Invasive species have a significant economic and ecological cost and biological control can be a powerful tool in their management. Classical biological control practice involves the re-establishment of trophic links between specialist insect and fungal agents to regulate populations of invasive species. However, the permanent nature of biological control agent introductions raises concerns about the unintended consequences of such introductions on non-target organisms, particularly when such agents are ineffective on their target organisms. In this paper, we explore the current debate in the selection of agents for weed classical biological control. We then propose an alternate approach, based on studying plant response to simulated herbivory, that could minimize the chances of release of ineffective agents. Simulating herbivory could yield insights into the vulnerability of plants to certain types of damage. Selection of agents within guilds that are likely to have a significant influence on the plant can improve the chances of achieving biological control sooner and reduce the likelihood of releasing ineffective agents that may have non-target impacts. We propose a method by which simulated herbivory could be integrated into the agent selection process and discuss its strengths and shortcomings. We present case studies of two Neotropical weeds illustrating how this method could be applied. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NEW APPROACH FOR SELECTING BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL AGENTS
    HOKKANEN, H
    PIMENTEL, D
    CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 1984, 116 (08): : 1109 - 1121
  • [2] Selecting aggressiveness to improve biological control agents efficiency
    Pierre Royer
    François Dumont
    Caroline Provost
    Eric Lucas
    Journal of Pest Science, 2022, 95 : 1589 - 1596
  • [3] Selecting aggressiveness to improve biological control agents efficiency
    Royer, Pierre
    Dumont, Francois
    Provost, Caroline
    Lucas, Eric
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2022, 95 (04) : 1589 - 1596
  • [4] Herbivory by Biological Control Agents Improves Herbicidal Control of Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)
    Tipping, Philip W.
    Gettys, Lyn A.
    Minteer, Carey R.
    Foley, Jeremiah R.
    Sardes, Samantha N.
    INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 10 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [5] Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents
    Morin, L.
    Reid, A. M.
    Sims-Chilton, N. M.
    Buckley, Y. M.
    Dhileepan, K.
    Hastwell, G. T.
    Nordblom, T. L.
    Raghu, S.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2009, 51 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [6] Effectiveness of classical weed biological control agents released in Australia
    Cullen, J. M.
    Sheppard, A. W.
    Raghu, S.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2022, 166
  • [7] Parasitoid wasps as effective biological control agents
    Wang Zhi-zhi
    Liu Yin-quan
    Shi Min
    Huang Jian-hua
    Chen Xue-xin
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2019, 18 (04) : 705 - 715
  • [8] Parasitoid wasps as effective biological control agents
    WANG Zhi-zhi
    LIU Yin-quan
    SHI Min
    HUANG Jian-hua
    CHEN Xue-xin
    JournalofIntegrativeAgriculture, 2019, 18 (04) : 705 - 715
  • [9] Interactions between two biological control agents and their target weed: a beetle, a bug and a cactus weed
    Mnqeta, Zezethu
    Paterson, Iain D.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 29 (10) : 979 - 990
  • [10] Examination of sex attractants for monitoring weed biological control agents in Hawaii
    Suckling, David Maxwell
    Gibb, Andrew Robert
    Johnson, Tracy
    Hall, David Robert
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 16 (09) : 919 - 927