Visual processing levels revealed by response latencies to changes in different visual attributes

被引:64
|
作者
Barbur, JL
Wolf, J
Lennie, P
机构
[1] City Univ London, Appl Vis Res Ctr, London EC1V 0HB, England
[2] Univ Rochester, Ctr Visual Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
image attributes; pupil constriction; reaction time; visual latency; visual pathway;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.1998.0578
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Visual latencies, and their variation with stimulus attributes, can provide information about the level in the visual system at which different attributes of the image are analysed, and decisions about them made. A change in the colour, structure or movement of a visual stimulus brings about a highly reproducible transient constriction of the pupil that probably depends on visual cortical mechanisms. We measured this transient response to changes in several attributes of visual stimuli, and also measured manual reaction times to the same stimulus changes. Through analysis of latencies, we hoped to establish whether changes in different stimulus attributes were processed by mechanisms at the same or different levels in the visual pathway. Pupil responses to a change in spatial structure or colour are almost identical, but both are ca. 40 ms slower than those to a change in light flux, which are thought to depend largely on subcortical pathways. Manual reaction times to a change in spatial structure or colour, or to the onset of coherent movement, differ reliably, and all are longer than the reaction time to a change in light flux. On average, observers take 184 ms to detect a change in light Aux, 6 ms more to detect the onset of a grating, 30 ms more to detect a change in colour, and 37 ms more to detect the onset of coherent motion. The pattern of latency variation for pupil responses and reaction times suggests that the mechanisms that trigger the responses lie at different levels in cortex. Given our present knowledge of visual cortical organization, the long reaction time to the change in motion is surprising. The range of reaction times across different stimuli is consistent with decisions about the onset of a grating being made in V1 and decisions about the change in colour or change in motion being made in V4.
引用
收藏
页码:2321 / 2325
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Visual Information Processing Mechanism Revealed by fMRI Data
    Li, Jinpeng
    Zhang, Zhaoxiang
    He, Huiguang
    BRAIN INFORMATICS AND HEALTH, 2016, 9919 : 85 - 93
  • [32] Impaired visual word processing in dyslexia revealed with magnetoencephalography
    Salmelin, R
    Service, E
    Kiesila, P
    Uutela, K
    Salonen, O
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1996, 40 (02) : 157 - 162
  • [33] Ocular motor measures of visual processing changes in visual snow syndrome
    Solly, Emma J.
    Clough, Meaghan
    McKendrick, Allison M.
    Foletta, Paige
    White, Owen B.
    Fielding, Joanne
    NEUROLOGY, 2020, 95 (13) : E1784 - E1791
  • [34] Investigating developmental changes in sensory processing: visual mismatch response in healthy children
    Cleary, Katherine M.
    Donkers, Franc C. L.
    Evans, Anna M.
    Belger, Aysenil
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [35] LEVELS OF PERCEPTUAL PROCESSING IN DEVELOPMENT OF VISUAL ILLUSIONS
    GIRGUS, JS
    COREN, S
    FRAENKEL, R
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 11 (03) : 268 - 273
  • [36] ALTERED RESPONSE LATENCIES ON VISUAL-DISCRIMINATION TASKS IN RATS WITH DAMAGED RETINAS
    ANDERSON, KV
    OSTEEN, WK
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1974, 12 (04) : 633 - 637
  • [37] Visual aperiodic temporal prediction increases perceptual sensitivity and reduces response latencies
    Zhou, Ai-Bao
    Sang, Han-Bin
    Wang, Ai-Jun
    Zhang, Ming
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2020, 209
  • [38] Impaired visuospatial processing in cerebral visual impairment revealed by performance on a conjunction visual search task
    Manley, Claire E.
    Bauer, Corinna M.
    Bex, Peter J.
    Merabet, Lotfi B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT, 2024, 42 (03) : 587 - 598
  • [39] Visual short-term memory in monkeys for different visual attributes: distinctions in cholinergic mechanisms
    Chueva, I. V.
    Dudkin, K. N.
    Kruchinin, V. K.
    PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 : 84 - 84
  • [40] RESPONSE AND EVOKED-POTENTIAL LATENCIES ASSOCIATED WITH COMMISSION ERRORS IN VISUAL MONITORING
    PARASURAMAN, R
    DAVIES, DR
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1975, 17 (05): : 465 - 468