Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study

被引:151
|
作者
Li, CP
Chao, Y
Chi, KH
Chan, WK
Teng, HC
Lee, RC
Chang, FY
Lee, SD
Yen, SH
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2003年 / 57卷 / 01期
关键词
5-fluorouracil; gemcitabine; pancreatic cancer; chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00435-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine (GEM)-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods and Materials: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were studied. Eighteen patients were randomized to receive GEM CCRT (600 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks) and 16 patients to receive bolus 5-FU CCRT (500 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days repeated every 2 weeks for 6 weeks). All patients were to receive 3D-CRT 50.4-61.2 Gy at 1.8-Gy/d fractions and GEM (1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks repeated every 4 weeks) after RT. Results: The median survival and median time to progression were 14.5 months and 7.1 months for the GEM CCRT group and 6.7 months and 2.7 months for the 5-FU CCRT group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.019, respectively). The quality-adjusted life month survival time was 11.2 +/- 0.5 months for GEM CCRT and 6.0 +/- 0.3 months for 5-FU CCRT patients (p < 0.001). The response rate was 50% (four complete responses and five partial responses) for GEM CCRT and 13% (two partial responses) for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.005). Pain control was 39% for GEM CCRT and 6% for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.043). Grade 3-4 neutropenia (34% vs. 19%), thrombocytopenia (0% vs. 7%), nausea (33 % vs. 31 %), vomiting (17 % vs. 19 %), hospitalization days per month of survival (7.4 +/- 1.7 days vs. 8.0 +/- 1.3 days), and full dose of RT received (78 % vs. 75 %) were not significantly different between the GEM CCRT and 5-FU CCRT patients. Conclusion: GEM CCRT appears more effective than 5-FU CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and has comparable tolerability. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 104
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Results of a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment after chemoradiotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Taira, Koichi
    Boku, Narikazu
    Fukutomi, Akira
    Onozawa, Yusuke
    Hironaka, Shuichi
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Yasui, Hirofumi
    Yamazaki, Kentaro
    Taku, Keisei
    Hashimoto, Takayuki
    Nishimura, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 43 (11) : 875 - 880
  • [42] Results of a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment after chemoradiotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Koichi Taira
    Narikazu Boku
    Akira Fukutomi
    Yusuke Onozawa
    Shuichi Hironaka
    Takayuki Yoshino
    Hirofumi Yasui
    Kentaro Yamazaki
    Keisei Taku
    Takayuki Hashimoto
    Tetsuo Nishimura
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008, 43 : 875 - 880
  • [43] CISPLATIN + 5-FLUOROURACIL VERSUS 5-FLUOROURACIL ALONE IN ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    LABIANCA, R
    PANCERA, G
    CESANA, B
    CLERICI, M
    MONTINARI, F
    LUPORINI, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 24 (10): : 1579 - 1581
  • [44] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus induction docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by CCRT in locally advanced hypopharyngeal and base of tongue cancer: A randomized phase II study
    Lim, S. H.
    Sun, J-M.
    Hong, J.
    Oh, D.
    Ahn, Y. C.
    Chung, M. K.
    Jeong, H-S.
    Son, Y-I.
    Ahn, M-J.
    Baek, C-H.
    Park, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [45] TOXICITY STUDY OF GEMCITABINE, OXALIPLATIN AND BEVACIZUMAB THEN 5-FLUOROURACIL, OXALIPLATIN, BEVACIZUMAB AND RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER
    O'Dwyer, P. J.
    Sun, W.
    Harlacker, K.
    Giantonio, B.
    Rosato, E.
    Ginsberg, G.
    Kochman, M.
    Drebin, J.
    Metz, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 44 - 44
  • [46] Gemcitabine and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: A phase I-II study
    Oliani, C
    Padovani, M
    Manno, P
    Barana, D
    Falconi, M
    Bassi, C
    Cavallini, G
    Pederzoli, P
    Cetto, GL
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 24 (3B) : 2107 - 2112
  • [47] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer
    Almhanna, Khaldoun
    Hoffe, Sarah
    Strosberg, Jonathan
    Dinwoodie, William
    Meredith, Kenneth
    Shridhar, Ravi
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [48] Irinotecan plus gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer:: A phase II study
    Endlicher, E.
    Troppmann, M.
    Kullmann, A.
    Goelder, S.
    Herold, T.
    Herfarth, H.
    Grossmann, J.
    Schlottmann, K.
    Kullmann, F.
    ONCOLOGY, 2007, 72 (5-6) : 279 - 284
  • [49] Toxicity data for preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced esophageal cancer
    Thukral, A.
    Metz, J.
    Hwang, W. -T.
    O'Dwyer, P.
    Plastaras, J.
    Both, S.
    Bar Ad, V.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2011, 24 (05) : 330 - 336
  • [50] Analysis of the clinical benefit of 5-fluorouracil and radiation treatment in locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Fisher, BJ
    Perera, FE
    Kocha, W
    Tomiak, A
    Taylor, M
    Vincent, M
    Bauman, GS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (02): : 291 - 295