Cartesian Genetic Programming as an Optimizer of Programs Evolved with Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming

被引:2
|
作者
Koncal, Ondrej [1 ]
Sekanina, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Brno Univ Technol, IT4Innovat Ctr Excellence, Fac Informat Technol, Bozetechova 2, Brno 61266, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
Cartesian Genetic Programming; Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming; Symbolic regression;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-16670-0_7
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming (GSGP), genetic operators directly work at the level of semantics rather than syntax. It provides many advantages, including much higher quality of resulting individuals (in terms of error) in comparison with a common genetic programming. However, GSGP produces extremely huge solutions that could be difficult to apply in systems with limited resources such as embedded systems. We propose Subtree Cartesian Genetic Programming (SCGP) - a method capable of reducing the number of nodes in the trees generated by GSGP. SCGP executes a common Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) on all elementary subtrees created by GSGP and on various compositions of these optimized subtrees in order to create one compact representation of the original program. SCGP does not guarantee the (exact) semantic equivalence between the CGP individuals and the GSGP subtrees, but the user can define conditions when a particular CGP individual is acceptable. We evaluated SCGP on four common symbolic regression benchmark problems and the obtained node reduction is from 92.4% to 99.9%.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 113
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asynchronous Parallel Cartesian Genetic Programming
    Harter, Adam
    Tauritz, Daniel R.
    Siever, William M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCO'17 COMPANION), 2017, : 1820 - 1824
  • [42] Comparative Evaluation of Genetic Operators in Cartesian Genetic Programming
    Manazir, Abdul
    Raza, Khalid
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, ISDA 2021, 2022, 418 : 765 - 774
  • [43] Multitask Evolution with Cartesian Genetic Programming
    Scott, Eric O.
    De Jong, Kenneth A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCO'17 COMPANION), 2017, : 255 - 256
  • [44] Compact Version of Cartesian Genetic Programming
    Burian, Petr
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ELECTRONICS (AE), 2014, : 63 - 66
  • [45] More Efficient Evolution of Small Genetic Programs in Cartesian Genetic Programming by Using Genotypic Age
    Kalkreuth, Roman
    Rudolph, Guenter
    Krone, Joerg
    2016 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2016, : 5052 - 5059
  • [46] Breast Cancer Detection Using Cartesian Genetic Programming evolved Artificial Neural Networks
    Ahmad, Arbab Masood
    Khan, Gul Muhammad
    Mahmud, S. Ali
    Miller, Julian F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2012, : 1031 - 1038
  • [47] Classification of Arrhythmia Types Using Cartesian Genetic Programming Evolved Artificial Neural Networks
    Ahmad, Arbab Masood
    Khan, Gul Muhammad
    Mahmud, Sahibzada Ali
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF NEURAL NETWORKS, EANN 2013, PT I, 2013, 383 : 282 - 291
  • [48] Memetic Semantic Genetic Programming
    Ffrancon, Robyn
    Schoenauer, Marc
    GECCO'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2015, : 1023 - 1030
  • [49] Semantic methods in genetic programming
    O'Neill, Michael
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND EVOLVABLE MACHINES, 2016, 17 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [50] Semantic methods in genetic programming
    Michael O’Neill
    Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 2016, 17 : 3 - 4