Generating legal arguments using multiple agents

被引:0
|
作者
Allen, M [1 ]
Bench-Capon, T [1 ]
Staniford, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Chester Coll, Chester, Cheshire, England
来源
IC-AI'2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1-III | 2000年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
One of the most significant series of experiments in AI and Law is the investigation of case based reasoning carried out in the HYPO, CABERET and CATO projects. It is important to understand what has been achieved in these experiments, and this requires that the techniques be applied to a variety of domains. The techniques are not, however, straightforward to apply. In order to provide an experimental environment for investigating the techniques further, we have re-implemented the central argument generation process as a set of agents written in JAVA using IBMS Aglet agent building framework. By using this environment it will be possible to explore the general applicability of the techniques. In this paper we give a summary of an algorithmic description of argument building LI HYPO and CATO, and describe our implementation of the algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 187
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Modelling competing legal arguments using Bayesian model comparison and averaging
    Neil, Martin
    Fenton, Norman
    Lagnado, David
    Gill, Richard David
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2019, 27 (04) : 403 - 430
  • [12] Generating Patterns Using Multiple Targets
    Tripathy, Twinkle
    Humne, Ankita
    Sinha, Arpita
    2016 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2016, : 879 - 884
  • [13] Modelling competing legal arguments using Bayesian model comparison and averaging
    Martin Neil
    Norman Fenton
    David Lagnado
    Richard David Gill
    Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2019, 27 : 403 - 430
  • [14] A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks
    Fenton, Norman
    Neil, Martin
    Lagnado, David A.
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2013, 37 (01) : 61 - 102
  • [15] Unacceptable Generalizations in Arguments on Legal Evidence
    Christian Dahlman
    Argumentation, 2017, 31 : 83 - 99
  • [16] LEGAL ARGUMENTS AND LINGUISTIC ARGUMENTS: WHEN THE LANGUAGE IN USE REVEALS PREJUDICES
    Valerio, Daiane
    Forneck, Kari Lucia
    LINGUISTICA Y LITERATURA, 2021, (79): : 256 - 270
  • [17] The Argumentative Status of Foreign Legal Arguments
    Bell, John
    UTRECHT LAW REVIEW, 2012, 8 (02): : 8 - 19
  • [18] Using Legal Ontology for Query Enhancement in Generating a Document Summary
    Saravanan, M.
    Ravindran, B.
    Raman, S.
    LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 165 : 171 - 172
  • [19] Non legal evaluations in the Papinian Arguments
    Wolf, J. G.
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS-REVUE D HISTOIRE DU DROIT-THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2013, 81 (3-4): : 633 - 643
  • [20] Legal Reasoning: Arguments from Comparison
    Coendet, Thomas
    ARCHIV FUR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 2016, 102 (04): : 476 - 507