Collaborative Double Robust Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation

被引:87
|
作者
van der Laan, Mark J. [1 ]
Gruber, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
关键词
asymptotic linearity; coarsening at random; causal effect; censored data; cross-validation; collaborative double robust; double robust; efficient influence curve; estimating function; estimator selection; influence curve; G-computation; locally efficient; loss-function; marginal structural model; maximum likelihood estimation; model selection; pathwise derivative; semiparametric model; sieve; super efficiency; super-learning; targeted maximum likelihood estimation; targeted nuisance parameter estimator selection; variable importance; DEMYSTIFYING DOUBLE ROBUSTNESS; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES; CAUSAL INFERENCE;
D O I
10.2202/1557-4679.1181
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimators represent a fundamental further advance over standard targeted maximum likelihood estimators of a pathwise differentiable parameter of a data generating distribution in a semiparametric model, introduced in van der Laan, Rubin (2006). The targeted maximum likelihood approach involves fluctuating an initial estimate of a relevant factor (Q) of the density of the observed data, in order to make a bias/variance tradeoff targeted towards the parameter of interest. The fluctuation involves estimation of a nuisance parameter portion of the likelihood, g. TMLE has been shown to be consistent and asymptotically normally distributed (CAN) under regularity conditions, when either one of these two factors of the likelihood of the data is correctly specified, and it is semiparametric efficient if both are correctly specified. In this article we provide a template for applying collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation (C-TMLE) to the estimation of pathwise differentiable parameters in semi-parametric models. The procedure creates a sequence of candidate targeted maximum likelihood estimators based on an initial estimate for Q coupled with a succession of increasingly non-parametric estimates for g. In a departure from current state of the art nuisance parameter estimation, C-TMLE estimates of g are constructed based on a loss function for the targeted maximum likelihood estimator of the relevant factor Q that uses the nuisance parameter to carry out the fluctuation, instead of a loss function for the nuisance parameter itself. Likelihood-based cross-validation is used to select the best estimator among all candidate TMLE estimators of Q(0) in this sequence. A penalized-likelihood loss function for Q is suggested when the parameter of interest is borderline-identifiable. We present theoretical results for "collaborative double robustness," demonstrating that the collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimator is CAN even when Q and g are both misspecified, providing that g solves a specified score equation implied by the difference between the Q and the true Q(0). This marks an improvement over the current definition of double robustness in the estimating equation literature. We also establish an asymptotic linearity theorem for the C-DR-TMLE of the target parameter, showing that the C-DR-TMLE is more adaptive to the truth, and, as a consequence, can even be super efficient if the first stage density estimator does an excellent job itself with respect to the target parameter. This research provides a template for targeted efficient and robust loss-based learning of a particular target feature of the probability distribution of the data within large (infinite dimensional) semi-parametric models, while still providing statistical inference in terms of confidence intervals and p-values. This research also breaks with a taboo (e.g., in the propensity score literature in the field of causal inference) on using the relevant part of likelihood to fine-tune the fitting of the nuisance parameter/censoring mechanism/treatment mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:71
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Targeted maximum likelihood based estimation for longitudinal mediation analysis
    Wang, Zeyi
    van der Laan, Lars
    Petersen, Maya
    Gerds, Thomas
    Kvist, Kajsa
    van der Laan, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [22] Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies
    Schuler, Megan S.
    Rose, Sherri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 185 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [23] Robust maximum-likelihood estimation of multivariable dynamic systems
    Gibson, S
    Ninness, B
    AUTOMATICA, 2005, 41 (10) : 1667 - 1682
  • [24] Robust distributed maximum likelihood estimation with dependent quantized data
    Shen, Xiaojing
    Varshney, Pramod K.
    Zhu, Yunmin
    AUTOMATICA, 2014, 50 (01) : 169 - 174
  • [25] A Variational Approach to Robust Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Speech Recognition
    Omar, Mohamed Kamal
    INTERSPEECH 2007: 8TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1049 - 1052
  • [26] Robust estimation of optical flow based on the maximum likelihood estimators
    KAIST, Taejon, Korea, Republic of
    IEICE Trans Inf Syst, 9 (1286-1295):
  • [27] Robust estimation of optical flow based on the maximum likelihood estimators
    Lee, KH
    Wohn, KY
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, 1996, E79D (09) : 1286 - 1295
  • [28] Robust estimation of rotations from relative measurements by maximum likelihood
    Boumal, Nicolas
    Singer, Amit
    Absil, P. -A.
    2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 1156 - 1161
  • [29] Robust Deformable Image Registration Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation
    Xia, J.
    Chen, Y.
    Samant, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [30] Robust maximum likelihood estimation in Q-space MRI
    Landman, B. A.
    Farrell, J. A. D.
    Smith, S. A.
    Calabresi, P. A.
    van Zijl, P. C. M.
    Prince, J. L.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 867 - +