Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex in migraine patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Brigo, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Storti, Monica [3 ]
Nardone, Raffaele [2 ,4 ]
Fiaschi, Antonio [1 ]
Bongiovanni, Luigi Giuseppe [1 ]
Tezzon, Frediano [2 ]
Manganotti, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Neurol Neuropsychol Morphol & Movement Sci, Sect Clin Neurol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Franz Tappeiner Hosp, Dept Neurol, Merano, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Med, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Christian Doppler Klin, Dept Neurol, Salzburg, Austria
来源
JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN | 2012年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
Meta-analysis; Migraine; Phosphenes; Systematic review; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PHOSPHENE THRESHOLDS; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; MOTOR; SINGLE; AURA; HYPEREXCITABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10194-012-0445-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the prevalence of phosphenes and the phosphene threshold (PT) values obtained during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in adults with migraine. Controlled studies measuring PT by single-pulse TMS in adults with migraine with or without aura (MA, MwA) were systematically searched. Prevalence of phosphenes and PT values were assessed calculating mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Ten trials (277 migraine patients and 193 controls) were included. Patients with MA had statistically significant lower PT compared with controls when a circular coil was used (MD -28.33; 95 % CI -36.09 to -20.58); a similar result was found in MwA patients (MD -17.12; 95 % CI -23.81 to -10.43); using a figure-of-eight coil the difference was not statistically significant. There was a significantly higher phosphene prevalence in MA patients compared with control subjects (OR 4.21; 95 % CI 1.18-15.01). No significant differences were found either in phosphene reporting between patients with MwA and controls, or in PT values obtained with a figure-of-eight coil in MA and MwA patients versus controls. Overall considered, these results support the hypothesis of a primary visual cortex hyper-excitability in MA, providing not enough evidence for MwA. A significant statistical heterogeneity reflects clinical and methodological differences across studies, and higher temporal variabilities among PT measurements over time, related to unstable excitability levels. Patients should therefore be evaluated in the true interictal period with an adequate headache-free interval. Furthermore, skull thickness and ovarian cycle should be assessed as possible confounding variables, and sham stimulation should be performed to reduce the rate of false positives. Phosphene prevalence alone cannot be considered a measure of cortical excitability, but should be integrated with PT evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 349
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retest reliability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the healthy human motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kanig, Carolina
    Osnabruegge, Mirja
    Schwitzgebel, Florian
    Litschel, Karsten
    Seiberl, Wolfgang
    Mack, Wolfgang
    Schoisswohl, Stefan
    Schecklmann, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [32] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation for auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guttesen, Liv Liebach
    Albert, Nikolai
    Nordentoft, Merete
    Hjorthoj, Carsten
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 143 : 163 - 175
  • [33] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Lee, Hyune June
    Kim, Sung Min
    Kwon, Ji Yean
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [34] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Xue
    Yan, Wangwang
    Wan, Ruihan
    Lin, Yangyang
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Song, Ge
    Zheng, Kangyong
    Wang, Yuling
    Wang, Xueqiang
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2022, 132 : 130 - 141
  • [35] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Spasticity Poststroke
    McIntyre, Amanda
    Mirkowski, Magdalena
    Thompson, Spencer
    Burhan, Amer M.
    Miller, Tom
    Teasell, Robert
    PM&R, 2018, 10 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [36] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Hyune June Lee
    Sung Min Kim
    Ji Yean Kwon
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [37] Durability of antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Senova, Suhan
    Cotovio, Goncalo
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Oliveira-Maia, Albino J.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (01) : 119 - 128
  • [38] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiao
    Yin, Lu
    An, Yun
    Yan, Huixin
    Zhang, Tao
    Lu, Xingang
    Yan, Juntao
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 59
  • [39] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Wang, Liang-Jen
    Lin, Pao-Yen
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (05) : 1110 - 1118
  • [40] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as Treatment of Poststroke Depression A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shen, Yiting
    Cai, Zhengyun
    Liu, Furong
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Ni, Guangxia
    NEUROLOGIST, 2022, 27 (04) : 177 - 182