Using the Physician Global Assessment in a Clinical Setting to Measure and Track Patient Outcomes

被引:56
|
作者
Pascoe, Vanessa L. [1 ,2 ]
Enamandram, Monica [3 ]
Corey, Kristen C. [4 ]
Cheng, Carol E. [1 ,5 ]
Javorsky, Emilia J. [6 ]
Sung, Sarah M. [2 ]
Donahue, Kevin R. [1 ]
Kimball, Alexandra B. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Worcester, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
关键词
SEVERITY-INDEX; ACNE-VULGARIS; PSORIASIS-AREA; MODERATE; DISEASE; DERMATOLOGISTS; PREVALENCE; EFFICACY; GEL;
D O I
10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3513
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE In dermatology, the development of objective, standardized quality measures that can be used in a clinical setting is important to be able to respond to the needs of payers and credentialing and licensure bodies and to demonstrate dermatologic value. OBJECTIVE To examine the feasibility of using Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores to collect and track patient acne and psoriasis outcomes over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The PGA severity scoreswere included on physicians' billing sheets for patients with acne and psoriasis seen at a tertiary care center outpatient dermatology clinic from June 2011 through October 2012. A subset of patients from 5 clinics completed Patient Global Assessments (PtGAs) between November 2011 and May 2012. Thirty dermatology clinicians saw a total of 2770 patients with acne and 1516 patients with psoriasis in clinic, recording PGA scores for each patient. The PtGA scores were collected from 52 and 103 patients with acne and psoriasis, respectively, within the larger sample. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Longitudinal PGA severity scoreswere collected for acne and psoriasis. The PGA severity scores were analyzed over time, with the hypothesis that patient scores for both acne and psoriasis would improve between the initial and follow-up visits. The PtGA scores from a subset of clinics and dates were compared with PGA scores to assess within-clinic reliability, with the hypothesis that there would be good agreement between clinician and patient assessments. RESULTS New patient PGA outcomes showed considerable improvement over time. At 3-month follow-up, 14.6% of the acne cohort was graded as effectively clear, compared with 2.1% at baseline (P < .001). Similarly, at 3-month follow-up, 22.3% of the psoriasis cohort was graded as effectively clear, compared with 3.1% at baseline (P < .001). Additionally, interobserver agreement between PGA and PtGA scores was good (acne, k = 0.68; psoriasis, k = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The PGA can be readily incorporated into practice to track patient acne and psoriasis outcomes over time, representing an opportunity for dermatologists to evaluate performance and validate practice guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Assessment of Ankle Injury Outcomes: Case Scenario Using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Cosby, Nicole L.
    Hertel, Jay
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2011, 20 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [32] Discrepancy between patient and physician in assessment of global severity in early rheumatoid arthritis
    Yuko Kaneko
    Masataka Kuwana
    Tsutomu Takeuchi
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 14 (Suppl 1):
  • [33] Predictors of Discordance Between Patient and Physician Global Assessment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Alp, Gulay
    Solmaz, Dilek
    Cinakli, Haluk
    Ediboglu, Elif
    Otman, Eda
    Erpek, Esra
    Akar, Servet
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 73 : 2482 - 2483
  • [34] Outcomes assessment of clinical pharmacy services in a psychiatric inpatient setting
    Canales, PL
    Dorson, PG
    Crismon, ML
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2001, 58 (14) : 1309 - 1316
  • [35] The validity of standardized patient assessment using faculty-physician global ratings as the gold-standard criterion
    Swartz, MH
    Colliver, JA
    Bardes, CL
    Charon, R
    Fried, ED
    Moroff, S
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1997, : 725 - 727
  • [36] Discrepancy between patient and physician in assessment of global severity in early rheumatoid arthritis
    Kaneko, Yuko
    Kuwana, Masataka
    Takeuchi, Tsutomu
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2012, 14
  • [37] Patient and physician global assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in 12 countries
    Sokka, T.
    Kautiainen, H.
    Belmonte, M.
    Naranjo, A.
    Toloza, S.
    Cazzato, M.
    Salaffi, F.
    Calvia, A.
    Baecklund, E.
    Herborn, G.
    Minnock, R.
    Immonen, K.
    Knudsen, L. S.
    Tunc, R.
    Celik, S.
    Pincus, T.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 : 602 - 602
  • [38] Quantifying the Contributors to Global Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity by the Patient and the Physician
    Studenic, Paul
    Smolen, Josef
    Aletaha, Daniel
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S835 - S836
  • [39] Concordance Between Patient and Physician Global Assessment of the Disease in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis
    Gallino Yanzi, Josefina
    Luis Cerda, Osvaldo
    Landi, Margarita
    Zaffarana, Cecilia
    Schneeberger, Emilce
    Citera, Gustavo
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [40] Patient-physician discordance of global disease assessment in psoriatic arthritis patients
    Hamilton, Gina
    Tobin, Yvonne
    Ardern, Rose
    Rahman, Proton
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2011, 38 (06) : 1157 - 1157