Derived operating rules for a reservoir operation system: Comparison of decision trees, neural decision trees and fuzzy decision trees

被引:37
|
作者
Wei, Chih-Chiang [1 ]
Hsu, Nien-Sheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Toko Univ, Dept Informat Management, Pu Tzu City 61363, Chia Yi County, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2006WR005792
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article compares the decision-tree algorithm (C5.0), neural decision-tree algorithm (NDT) and fuzzy decision-tree algorithm (FIDs) for addressing reservoir operations regarding water supply during normal periods. The conventional decision-tree algorithm, such as ID3 and C5.0, executes rapidly and can easily be translated into if-then-else rules. However, the C5.0 algorithm cannot discover dependencies among attributes and cannot treat the non-axis-parallel class boundaries of data. The basic concepts of the two algorithms presented are: (1) NDT algorithm combines the neural network technologies and conventional decision-tree algorithm capabilities, and (2) FIDs algorithm extends to apply fuzzy sets for all attributes with membership function grades and generates a fuzzy decision tree. In order to obtain higher classification rates in FIDs, the flexible trapezoid fuzzy sets are employed to define membership functions. Furthermore, an intelligent genetic algorithm is utilized to optimize the large number of variables in fuzzy decision-tree design. The applicability of the presented algorithms is demonstrated through a case study of the Shihmen Reservoir system. A network flow optimization model for analyzing long-term supply demand is employed to generate the input-output patterns. Findings show superior performance of the FIDs model in contrast with C5.0, NDT and current reservoir operating rules.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy Decision Trees for Dynamic Data
    Marsala, Christophe
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE CONFERENCE ON EVOLVING AND ADAPTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (EAIS), 2013, : 17 - 24
  • [32] MAPTree: Beating "Optimal" Decision Trees with Bayesian Decision Trees
    Sullivan, Colin
    Tiwari, Mo
    Thrun, Sebastian
    THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 8, 2024, : 9019 - 9026
  • [33] Fuzzy decision trees in the support of breastfeeding
    Babic, SH
    Kokol, P
    Stiglic, MM
    13TH IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CBMS 2000), PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 7 - 11
  • [34] Fuzzy trees in decision support systems
    Savsek, Tomaz
    Vezjak, Marjan
    Pavesic, Nikola
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) : 293 - 310
  • [35] Fuzzy decision trees and numerical attributes
    Zeidler, J
    Schlosser, M
    Ittner, A
    Posthoff, C
    FUZZ-IEEE '96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 1996, : 985 - 990
  • [36] Fuzzy decision trees: Issues and methods
    Janikow, CZ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 1998, 28 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [37] Integration of fuzzy classifiers with decision trees
    Chiang, IJ
    Hsu, JYJ
    SOFT COMPUTING IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 1996, : 266 - 271
  • [38] Exemplar learning in fuzzy decision trees
    Janikow, CZ
    FUZZ-IEEE '96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 1996, : 1500 - 1505
  • [39] Fusing Fuzzy Monotonic Decision Trees
    Wang, Jieting
    Qian, Yuhua
    Li Feijiang
    Liang, Jiye
    Ding, Weiping
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 28 (05) : 887 - 900
  • [40] C-fuzzy decision trees
    Pedrycz, W
    Sosnowski, ZA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2005, 35 (04): : 498 - 511