Derived operating rules for a reservoir operation system: Comparison of decision trees, neural decision trees and fuzzy decision trees

被引:37
|
作者
Wei, Chih-Chiang [1 ]
Hsu, Nien-Sheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Toko Univ, Dept Informat Management, Pu Tzu City 61363, Chia Yi County, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2006WR005792
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article compares the decision-tree algorithm (C5.0), neural decision-tree algorithm (NDT) and fuzzy decision-tree algorithm (FIDs) for addressing reservoir operations regarding water supply during normal periods. The conventional decision-tree algorithm, such as ID3 and C5.0, executes rapidly and can easily be translated into if-then-else rules. However, the C5.0 algorithm cannot discover dependencies among attributes and cannot treat the non-axis-parallel class boundaries of data. The basic concepts of the two algorithms presented are: (1) NDT algorithm combines the neural network technologies and conventional decision-tree algorithm capabilities, and (2) FIDs algorithm extends to apply fuzzy sets for all attributes with membership function grades and generates a fuzzy decision tree. In order to obtain higher classification rates in FIDs, the flexible trapezoid fuzzy sets are employed to define membership functions. Furthermore, an intelligent genetic algorithm is utilized to optimize the large number of variables in fuzzy decision-tree design. The applicability of the presented algorithms is demonstrated through a case study of the Shihmen Reservoir system. A network flow optimization model for analyzing long-term supply demand is employed to generate the input-output patterns. Findings show superior performance of the FIDs model in contrast with C5.0, NDT and current reservoir operating rules.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision Trees based Fuzzy Rules
    Al-Gunaid, Mohammed A.
    Shcherbakov, Maxim V.
    Kamaev, Valeriy A.
    Gerget, Olga M.
    Tyukov, Anton P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, SOCIAL SPHERE AND MEDICINE (ITSMSSM), 2016, 51 : 502 - 508
  • [2] A comparative study of pruned decision trees and fuzzy decision trees
    Benbrahim, H
    Bensaid, A
    PEACHFUZZ 2000 : 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY - NAFIPS, 2000, : 227 - 231
  • [3] Decision Rules Derived from Optimal Decision Trees with Hypotheses
    Azad, Mohammad
    Chikalov, Igor
    Hussain, Shahid
    Moshkov, Mikhail
    Zielosko, Beata
    ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (12)
  • [4] FUZZY DECISION TREES
    ADAMO, JM
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1980, 4 (03) : 207 - 219
  • [5] Generation of Fuzzy Rules from Decision Trees
    Hall, Lawrence O.
    Lande, Petter
    Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 1998, 2 (04): : 128 - 133
  • [6] Data mining with decision trees and decision rules
    Apte, C
    Weiss, S
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 1997, 13 (2-3): : 197 - 210
  • [7] Fuzzy-neural inference in decision trees
    Crockett, K
    Bandar, Z
    O'Shea, J
    INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATED LEARNING - IDEAL 2002, 2002, 2412 : 481 - 486
  • [8] Fuzzy Decision Trees in Medical Decision Making Support System
    Levashenko, Vitaly
    Zaitseva, Elena
    2012 FEDERATED CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2012, : 213 - 219
  • [9] An Approach for Generating Fuzzy Rules from Decision Trees
    Razavi, Amir R.
    Nystrom, Mikael
    Stachowicz, Marian S.
    Gill, Hans
    Ahlfeldt, Hans
    Shahsavar, Nosrat
    UBIQUITY: TECHNOLOGIES FOR BETTER HEALTH IN AGING SOCIETIES, 2006, 124 : 581 - +
  • [10] Learning fuzzy decision trees
    Apolloni, B
    Zamponi, G
    Zanaboni, AM
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 1998, 11 (05) : 885 - 895