Effectiveness of Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatic Decompensation

被引:9
|
作者
Park, Min Kyung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Yun Bin [1 ,2 ]
Moon, Hyemi [3 ]
Choi, Na Ryung [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Minseok Albert [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Heejoon [1 ,2 ]
Nam, Joon Yeul [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Eun Ju [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong-Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Su Jong [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Yoon Jun [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Jung-Hwan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Liver Res Inst, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Liver cancer; Chemotherapy; Targeted therapy; Survival; Child-Pugh classification; PHASE-III; 1ST-LINE THERAPY; TRIAL; PROGNOSIS; EFFICACY; CRITERIA; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-021-07365-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aim Lenvatinib and sorafenib are currently available to treat patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, since the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of lenvatinib and sorafenib included only patients with Child- Pugh class A, little is known about the effectiveness of the treatments in patients with hepatic decompensation. We compared the effectiveness of lenvatinib and sorafenib in decompensated patients with unresectable HCC. Methods Consecutive patients who were classified as Child-Pugh class B or C and received lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC between November 2018 and April 2020 at a tertiary referral center were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression, best overall tumor response, and safety profiles. Results Among 94 patients, 34 received lenvatinib and 60 received sorafenib. The median OS was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-5.2): 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.3) for lenvatinib and 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.4) for sorafenib. The treatment regimen was not associated with significant improvement in OS after adjusting for covariables (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54-1.54; P = 0.74). The treatment regimen was not an independent predictor of PFS (lenvatinib vs. sorafenib; aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.48-1.24; P = 0.28). HRs were maintained even after balancing with the inverse probability treatment weighting method. Objective response rates were 11.8% and 6.7% in patients receiving lenvatinib and sorafenib, respectively (P = 0.45). Ten patients in both groups (five in the lenvatinib group and five in the sorafenib group) underwent dose modification due to adverse events, and significant difference was not observed between the treatment groups (P = 0.49). Conclusion The effectiveness of lenvatinib and sorafenib was comparable for the treatment of unresectable HCC in decompensated patients.
引用
收藏
页码:4939 / 4949
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib versus transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative retrospective study
    Zhang, Jin-Xing
    Chen, Yu-Xing
    Zhou, Chun-Gao
    Liu, Jin
    Liu, Sheng
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    Zu, Qing-Quan
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 52 (09) : 794 - 803
  • [32] Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib in non-viral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: An international study.
    Casadei-Gardini, Andrea
    Rimini, Margherita
    Rimassa, Lorenza
    Burgio, Valentina
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Tada, Toshifumi
    Shimose, Shigeo
    Suda, Goki
    Yoo, Changhoon
    Cheon, Jaekyng
    Pinato, David J. James
    Scartozzi, Mario
    Cascinu, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [33] Covariate-adjusted analysis of the Phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Briggs, Andrew
    Daniele, Bruno
    Dick, Katherine
    Evans, Thomas R. Jeffry
    Galle, Peter R.
    Hubner, Richard A.
    Lopez, Carlos
    Siebert, Uwe
    Tremblay, Gabriel
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 122 (12) : 1754 - 1759
  • [34] Covariate-adjusted analysis of the Phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Andrew Briggs
    Bruno Daniele
    Katherine Dick
    Thomas R. Jeffry Evans
    Peter R. Galle
    Richard A. Hubner
    Carlos Lopez
    Uwe Siebert
    Gabriel Tremblay
    British Journal of Cancer, 2020, 122 : 1754 - 1759
  • [35] Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis
    Casadei-Gardini, Andrea
    Scartozzi, Mario
    Tada, Toshifumi
    Yoo, Changhoon
    Shimose, Shigeo
    Masi, Gianluca
    Lonardi, Sara
    Frassineti, Luca Giovanni
    Nicola, Silvestris
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Kumada, Takashi
    Kim, Hyung-Don
    Koga, Hironori
    Vivaldi, Caterina
    Solda, Caterina
    Hiraoka, Atsushi
    Bang, Yeonghak
    Atsukawa, Masanori
    Torimura, Takuji
    Tsuj, Kunihiko
    Itobayashi, Ei
    Toyoda, Hidenori
    Fukunishi, Shinya
    Rimassa, Lorenza
    Rimini, Margherita
    Cascinu, Stefano
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 41 (06) : 1389 - 1397
  • [36] Usefulness of Circulating CYFRA21-1 in Patients as a Biomarker in Patients Taking Sorafenib or Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Takada, Hitomi
    Osawa, Leona
    Komiyama, Yasuyuki
    Kato, Ryoh
    Nakakuki, Natsuko
    Muraoka, Masaru
    Suzuki, Yuichiro
    Tatsumi, Akihisa
    Sato, Mitsuaki
    Takahashi, Ei
    Takano, Shinichi
    Fukasawa, Mitsuharu
    Yamaguchi, Tatsuya
    Inoue, Taisuke
    Maekawa, Shinya
    Enomoto, Nobuyuki
    REPORTS, 2021, 4 (03)
  • [37] Real-world effectiveness of lenvatinib monotherapy among unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the USA
    Singal, Amit G.
    Nagar, Saurabh P.
    Hitchens, Abby
    Davis, Keith L.
    Iyer, Shrividya
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (21) : 2759 - 2768
  • [38] ATEZOLIZUMAB COMBINED WITH BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS SORAFENIB AND LENVATINIB FOR PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Saowapa, Sakditad
    Polpichai, Natchaya
    Danpanichkul, Pojsakorn
    Suenghataiphorn, Thanathip
    Kulthamrongsri, Narathorn
    McCullough, Maireigh
    Tijani, Lukman
    Kaewdech, Apichat
    HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 80
  • [39] Lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a second-line option in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: An observational study
    Lombardi, P.
    Manfredi, G. F.
    Celsa, C.
    Stefanini, B.
    Marron, T.
    Saeed, A.
    Pinter, M.
    Ulahannan, S.
    Piscaglia, F.
    Lin, C-Y.
    Dalbeni, A.
    Masi, G.
    Schoenlein, M.
    Galle, P. R.
    Kudo, M.
    Rimassa, L.
    Chon, H.
    Pirisi, M.
    Pinato, D. J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S666 - S666
  • [40] Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Finn, Richard S.
    Qin, Shukui
    Han, Kwang-Hyub
    Ikeda, Kenji
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Baron, Ari
    Park, Joong-Won
    Han, Guohong
    Jassem, Jacek
    Blanc, Jean Frederic
    Vogel, Arndt
    Komov, Dmitry
    Evans, T. R. Jeffry
    Lopez, Carlos
    Dutcus, Corina
    Guo, Matthew
    Saito, Kenichi
    Kraljevic, Silvija
    Tamai, Toshiyuki
    Ren, Min
    Cheng, Ann-Lii
    LANCET, 2018, 391 (10126): : 1163 - 1173