Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review

被引:0
|
作者
Michalakis, KX
Hirayama, H
Garefis, PD
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Grad & Postgrad Prosthodont, Sch Dent, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
dental cement; dental implants; dental screw; denture retention; implant-retained dental prosthesis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This article presents a comparison of screw-retained and cement-retained implant prostheses based on the literature. The advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the 2 different types of restorations are discussed, because it is important to understand the influence of the attachment mechanism on many clinical aspects of implant dentistry. Several factors essential to the long-term success of any implant prosthesis were reviewed with regard to both methods of fixation. These factors include: (1) ease of fabrication and cost, (2) passivity of the framework, (3) retention, (4) occlusion, (5) esthetics, (6) delivery, and (7) retrievability.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 728
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A technique for recording the abutment screw angulation of cement-retained implant prostheses
    Lee, Ju-Hyoung
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 114 (05): : 741 - 742
  • [42] Alternative technique for investing abutments for screw-retained implant-supported restorations
    Ganddini, MR
    Tallents, RH
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 92 (05): : 504 - 505
  • [43] An auxiliary device for screw-retained fixed implant restorations which prevents extrusion of cement into screw-access openings
    Yang, Zhen
    Liu, Mingyue
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    Tan, Jianguo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (02): : 178 - 180
  • [44] Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review
    Chaar, M. S.
    Att, W.
    Strub, J. R.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2011, 38 (09) : 697 - 711
  • [45] Effect of various fixation parameters on strain development of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported restorations
    Schittenhelm, Birgit
    Karl, Matthias
    Graef, Friedrich
    Heckmann, Siegfried
    Taylor, Thomas
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 44 (06): : 421 - 428
  • [46] An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses
    Pietrabissa, R
    Gionso, L
    Quaglini, V
    Di Martino, E
    Simion, M
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (05) : 448 - 457
  • [47] The Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations
    Kurt, Murat
    Kulunk, Tolga
    Ural, Cagri
    Kulunk, Safak
    Danisman, Sengul
    Savas, Soner
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2013, 39 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [48] Long-Term Outcome of Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Partial Restorations
    Nissan, Joseph
    Narobai, Demitri
    Gross, Ora
    Ghelfan, Oded
    Chaushu, Gavriel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (05) : 1102 - 1107
  • [49] Clinical Performance of Screw-Versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant-Supported Reconstructions-A Systematic Review
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    Millen, Christopher
    Braegger, Urs
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 : 84 - 98
  • [50] Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study
    Kim, Hyun Ju
    Karasan, Duygu
    Park, Koungjin
    Kwon, Ho-Beom
    Han, Jung-Suk
    Lee, Jae-Hyun
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (01) : 33 - 41