Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review

被引:0
|
作者
Michalakis, KX
Hirayama, H
Garefis, PD
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Grad & Postgrad Prosthodont, Sch Dent, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
dental cement; dental implants; dental screw; denture retention; implant-retained dental prosthesis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This article presents a comparison of screw-retained and cement-retained implant prostheses based on the literature. The advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the 2 different types of restorations are discussed, because it is important to understand the influence of the attachment mechanism on many clinical aspects of implant dentistry. Several factors essential to the long-term success of any implant prosthesis were reviewed with regard to both methods of fixation. These factors include: (1) ease of fabrication and cost, (2) passivity of the framework, (3) retention, (4) occlusion, (5) esthetics, (6) delivery, and (7) retrievability.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 728
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry
    Hebel, KS
    Gajjar, RC
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 77 (01): : 28 - 35
  • [2] Prosthodontic safety checklist before delivery of screw-retained and cement-retained implant restorations
    Bidra, Avinash S.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 119 (01): : 193 - 194
  • [3] Survey of screw-retained versus cement-retained implant restorations used in both education and private dental practices
    Found, Anelyse Arata
    Shah, Shivani
    Fouda, Mohamed A.
    Santos, Maria Jacinta M. C.
    Butler, Sheila
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 88 (08) : 1029 - 1039
  • [4] Screw- Versus Cement-Retained Implant Restorations: Current Concepts
    Lee, Angie
    Okayasu, Kozue
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [5] Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
    de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    Verri, Fellippo Ramos
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (04): : 419 - 427
  • [6] Factors influencing success of cement versus screw-retained implant restorations: a clinical review
    Manawar, Ahmad
    Dhanasekar, B.
    Aparna, I. N.
    Naim, Hina
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2012, 4 (03) : 43 - 47
  • [7] A Systematic Review of Screw- versus Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations
    Sherif, Sami
    Susarla, Harlyn K.
    Kapos, Theodoros
    Munoz, Deborah
    Chang, Brian M.
    Wright, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [8] Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections
    Piattelli, A
    Scarano, A
    Paolantonio, M
    Assenza, B
    Leghissa, GC
    Di Bonaventura, G
    Catamo, G
    Piccolomini, R
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (09) : 1146 - 1150
  • [9] Bacterial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
    Di Labio, L
    Piattelli, A
    Assenza, B
    Leghissa, GC
    Scarano, A
    Paolantonio, M
    Piccolomini, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 213 - 213
  • [10] Porcelain Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained, Cement-Retained, and Screw-Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Metal Ceramic Posterior Crowns
    Al-Omari, Wael M.
    Shadid, Rola
    Abu-Naba'a, Layla
    El Masoud, Bilal
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (04): : 263 - 273